Doctor Who: Jon Pertwee’s first season (classic series)

...

Rating 5


1) Spearhead from Space (4 episodes: written by Robert Holmes, directed by Derek Martinus)
2) Doctor Who and the Silurians (7 episodes: written by Malcolm Hulke, directed by Timothy Combe)
3) The Ambassadors of Death (7 episodes: written by David Whitaker, with Trevor Ray and Malcolm Hulke, directed by Michael Ferguson)
4) Inferno (7 episodes: written by Don Houghton, directed by Douglas Camfield and Barry Letts)

Starring Jon Pertwee (The Doctor), Caroline John (Liz Shaw), Nicholas Courtney (Brigadier Alistair Lethbridge-Stewart) and John Levene (Sergeant Benton)


The TARDIS materialises on the planet Earth in the 20th Century, where the Doctor, who has just gone through a new regeneration, has been exiled by the Time Lords. He reluctantly agrees to work in an unofficial capacity for Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart of UNIT (United Nations Intelligence Taskforce), who had previously encountered and worked with him, in an earlier incarnation, on two other occasions. The Doctor works closely with Liz Shaw, a young graduate from the University of Cambridge who is seconded to UNIT as a scientific advisor. He spends much of his time using UNIT facilities to try to repair the TARDIS, which has been disabled by the Time Lords, but is also called on to deal with alien invasions, intergalactic kidnapping, military sabotage and mad scientists whose actions threaten to destroy the planet.

...


I don’t have any clear recollection of watching Doctor Who in its original incarnation when William Hartnell played the lead role, although I undoubtedly would have done. I do have memories of various stories from the period when the Doctor was played by Patrick Troughton and I was certainly watching it week on week long before Troughton gave up the role in the summer of 1969. However, it was the arrival of Jon Pertwee that probably coincided with the start of the period when I became an avid fan of the series and he remains my favourite Doctor. Budget constraints placed on the show dictated that the Doctor would now be exiled on Earth; something I think has been greeted down the years with a mixed reaction. It did, however, give the stories a consistent running theme and it always worked well for me. My fondest memories are reserved for stories from the second, third and fourth seasons of Pertwee’s Doctor, those that feature his companion Jo Grant, played by Katy Manning, but having recently watched his first season again I was struck by the unexpected high quality I found and the constantly fascinating and thought-provoking themes that still resonate strongly today.

It is at least fifteen years since I last watched ‘Inferno’, the final story in the season reviewed here, and probably longer for the preceding three stories. In fact, in the case of ‘The Ambassadors of Death’ I suspect this might be the first time I have seen it again since it was broadcast in late March through to the beginning of May 1970.

In a later story, ‘The Three Doctors’, which included the return and final appearance of William Hartnell, the first Doctor, he describes Pertwee and Troughton as the “dandy and the clown”. Just as Patrick Troughton had done before him, Jon Pertwee drew on some aspects of earlier interpretations of the Doctor and incorporated his own take on the character. Pertwee’s Doctor is a mixture of arrogance and compassion. His attitude towards his companions (Liz Shaw in this first season, Jo Grant later on and finally Sarah Jane Smith) is sometimes that of a stern father, sometimes a mentor and sometimes condescending, but no matter how sorely his patience is tried, he feels a great deal of affe
ction for them all. He is, first and foremost, a scientist, but he also sees himself as something of an action man. When he is not talking about “reversing the polarity” he is often to be found playing with various gadgets of his own invention or taking a very active role in the pursuit of villains.

Pertwee, who was also widely known for the television series ‘Worzel Gummidge’ and the long-running radio show ‘The Navy Lark’, seemed to have good screen chemistry with the other regular actors, notably Roger Delgado who played the Master from the beginning of his second season onwards. Delgado’s tragic death in June 1973 is said to have been a major factor in his decision to leave the series. He also worked very well with Nicholas Courtney, a great favourite amongst Doctor Who fans, who surely must make an appearance in the revived series at some point, although age may be a factor since he is now in his eighties.

The first season with Jon Pertwee, the seventh season of the so-called “classic series”, comprised twenty-five episodes between 3 January and 20 June 1970, each one 25 minutes in length, telling four stories. It opens with ‘Spearhead from Space’, which cleverly introduces the new Doctor in a satisfying manner and sets the scene for the direction the series would take over the next few years. It also introduces the Autons, who would appear again in ‘Terror of the Autons’, the opening story of Pertwee’s second season. They made a third appearance in 2005 in ‘Rose’, the very first episode of the revived series. ‘Spearhead from Space’ is told across four episodes (the remaining three stories each got seven episodes). It is also the first Doctor Who story to be filmed in colour.

‘Doctor Who and the Silurians’ marks the first appearance of the Silurians, reptilian creatures (clearly modelled on the 1954 film ‘The Creature from the Black Lagoon’) who, we discover, ruled the planet Earth 200 million years earlier. There is interesting moral ambiguity in the story about exactly who the aggressor is. We also have the theme of the dangers of nuclear power misused and science gone mad, something that is returned to again in ‘Inferno’. The Silurians are classic Doctor Who monsters, actors in rubber suits who largely seem to have been given only the very basic of stage directions. The labyrinth of caves in which the Silurians have been hibernating for all these millions of years are, of course, entirely artificial and unrealistic, but that’s all part of the charm of it. It is, in fact, a fast moving and enjoyable story. Paul Darrow, who is probably best remembered as Avon in ‘Blake’s 7’, is featured here, as is Geoffrey Palmer, who has starred in various popular sitcoms over the years. Palmer appeared in Doctor Who again, playing different roles, in ‘The Mutants’ in 1972 and ‘Voyage of the Damned’ in 2007.

‘The Ambassadors of Death’ is the story that surprised me most, probably because it is the one I remembered least. Even the opening credits sequence is slightly modified from the norm, coming in two parts with a brief recap teaser in between. The story was clearly inspired by ‘The Quatermass Experiment’, the classic 1953 BBC serial that was remade as a film by Hammer Film Productions in 1955. As is often the case with Doctor Who, it is best not to look for holes in the plot or dwell on the implausibility of some of the scenarios, but it just works really well as a story. I also noticed the use of some rather unusual and not always entirely appropriate original incidental music, which I found both odd and strangely compelling. ‘The Ambassadors of Death’ marks the first appearance of Sergeant Benton, a regular for the next few years to come, having previously appeared in the 1968 story ‘Invasion’ as Corporal Benton.

‘Inferno’ is widely regarded to be one of the classic Doctor Who stories. It has very obviously parallels with a 1967 Star Trek episode called ‘Mirror, Mirror’ and would seem to have been influenced by that earlier work. Once again, the theme of science gone mad is at the heart of the story. This time around the Doctor taps into some of the available nuclear power to conduct his continuing experiments on the TARDIS console and is shifted sideways into a parallel dimension in which he finds himself in a totalitarian version of Britain with a decidedly less than friendly version of Lethbridge-Stewart and UNIT. It’s an intense and rather downbeat story with some interesting themes and an unusual one insomuch that the Doctor fails to save the planet from destruction, in one reality at least. The “primords”, humans mutated into savage beasts who look uncannily like Oddbod in ‘Carry On Screaming’, need to be taken with tongue in cheek, but otherwise ‘Inferno’ maintains the very high standard of the previous three stories and the inter-related themes.

Jo Grant was and will probably always remain my favourite companion, undoubtedly because of nostalgia and the fact that as a twelve-year-old I had a huge crush on Katy Manning. However, there is no doubt in retrospect that she was a rather simpering character and, from this distant perspective, a distinctly sexist creation. This is given greater credence by the decision of producer Barry Letts to dispense with the actress Car
oline John after just one season because he felt Liz Shaw was an unsuitable companion for the Doctor (John was pregnant at the time, which undoubtedly would also have been a factor in the decision). Shaw was portrayed as a strong and independent character who respected the Doctor but was not intellectually threatened by him. Watching these first season episodes again, I realise how good this character who I previously had given very little thought to could have been had she stayed around longer.

I don’t know what younger viewers of the revived Doctor Who would make of this earlier incarnation. The very limited special effects of old Doctor Who have always been a point of discussion and good-natured humour and would undoubtedly be a big problem for some viewers used to the kind of special effects that are now the norm. The length and the slower pacing of the stories would also, I imagine, come as a surprise, as perhaps would the rather downbeat themes. For me, though, watching these episodes again has not just confirmed my memories of them, but actually surpassed my expectations.

When Doctor Who was revived in 2005 it was no longer permitted to refer to UNIT as United Nations Intelligence Taskforce and so it became Unified Intelligence Taskforce.

Numerous episodes of Doctor Who were wiped or otherwise destroyed by the BBC in the 1960s and 1970s. Considerable effort has been made to locate missing episodes from a number of different sources, primarily overseas broadcasters, although 108 episodes from the first six years of the show remain missing. The Jon Pertwee episodes were badly affected by the BBC’s policy of reusing or destroying old videotapes and although mostly now restored, several parts of ‘The Ambassadors of Death’ exist only in black and white.

Review posted 28 April 2010



...

Doctor Who: An Unearthly Child (classic series)

...

Rating 2½ (5 for the pilot episode)


Written by Anthony Coburn (and C E Webber, uncredited)

Directed by Waris Hussein (and Douglas Camfield – film inserts, uncredited)

Starring William Hartnell (The Doctor), Carole Ann Ford (Susan Foreman), Jacqueline Hill (Barbara Wright), William Russell (Ian Chesterton), Derek Newark (Za), Jeremy Young (Kal), Alethea Charlton (Hur), Howard Lang (Horg) and Eileen Way (Old Mother)



Schoolteacher Barbara Wright is concerned about her pupil Susan Foreman and shares these concerns with her colleague Ian Chesterton. Susan is unusually bright in many respects, but strangely uninformed in others. She is also secretive about her home life, other than to say she lives with her grandfather, who doesn’t like strangers. Barbara and Ian decide to confront Susan’s grandfather and go to the scrap yard Susan has given as her address. When they go inside the gates they discover a blue Police box and are then confronted by the elderly man, who is both evasive and angry at their interference. When they hear Susan’s voice from inside the box they force their way past the old man, only to discover that it is considerably bigger on the inside than out. Susan tells her teachers they are in a machine that can travel in time and space, which they do not believe. The Doctor angrily tells them they can now not leave and uses the controls to take them away from London in 1963 back in time to the Stone Age, where they all find themselves in deadly danger.

...


The very first episode of ‘Doctor Who’, entitled ‘An Unearthly Child’, was broadcast on BBC (there was only one BBC channel at the time) on 23 November 1963. It was part of a story told across four episodes. During the early years of the series, up to the latter stages of the third season in the Spring of 1966, each episode was given a separate title. So it was that ‘An Unearthly Child’ was followed by the episodes ‘The Cave of Skulls’, ‘The Forest of Fear’ and ‘The Firemaker’. However, it is the opening episode that is of particular interest and especially an earlier version, filmed a month or so before the one that was broadcast. Referred to these days as the “pilot” episode, it was not intended as such, but there were several technical problems identified with it and the depiction of the Doctor was considered to be too sinister and too frightening for younger viewers. It is this pilot that is most interesting to me.

I think it is superior to the later version, although how long the series could have progressed with such a cruel and unsympathetic version of the Doctor is a moot point. Even with the character softened somewhat through re-writes, William Hartnell continued to play him as an irascible and autocratic figure, emphasising his alien nature. This is something, to a lesser extent, that subsequent actors who assumed the role later on have continued to do from time to time, right through to the revived series, starting with Christopher Eccleston’s war-scarred Doctor in 2005.

The pilot is certainly rough around the edges, but even after nearly 47 years it still packs a punch, as does the later broadcast version. A big part of this, of course, is thanks to the opening credit visuals and the extraordinary theme music, composed by Ron Grainer and created by Delia Derbyshire at the BBC Radiophonic Workshop, using electronic oscillators and various pioneering tape loop and reverse tape effects. The other most significant contribution to the early and ongoing success of the series is the TARDIS, the time machine shaped like a Police box. Although an anachronism now that many younger viewers would not be familiar with outside of the series, they were still a common sight throughout the 1960s and, in fact, there are apparently one of two still in use in rural areas.

The BBC already had an established reputation for innovative and popular sci-fi drama, first in the 1950s with the ‘Quatermass’ trilogy (the three serials were broadcast live) and then in 1961 with ‘A for Andromeda’, which starred Julie Christie in one of her earliest roles. Tragically, only one of the seven episodes has survived. Much like these earlier productions, the episode ‘An Unearthly Child’, whether the pilot or the broadcast version, remains a significant moment in the history of British television and film science-fiction.

The following three episodes that make up the first story are not of as much interest and seen through our eyes now are borderline offensive, with their depiction of unintelligent “savages”, and entirely historically unauthentic and unrealistic. However, they do need to be considered within the context of the time in which they were made. What is interesting is that it is the character Ian Chesterton who is most proactive in getting them out of the predicament they find themselves in, while the Doctor often sulks and behaves in an almost childish manner, his pride easily hurt. He is a long way removed from the humanitarian Doctor of later years.

The Foreman scrap yard visited by Barbara and Ian in the opening episode, where they first encounter the Doctor and enter the TARDIS, is seen again in two subsequent stories much later on – ‘Attack of the Cybermen’ in 1985 and ‘Remembrance of the Daleks’ in 1989.

William Hartnell, the first Doctor, was an experienced theatre and film actor whose career dated back to the 1920s. He was 55 years old when he assumed the role, but he looked older. He was, by some accounts, not always easy to work with during his time on Doctor Who and ill health meant he had problems memorising his lines. He played the role in the first three seasons and the first two stories of season four. His final episode was broadcast on 29 October 1966. He returned briefly to appear in ‘The Three Doctors’ in December 1972 through into January 1973, although his appearance was limited by health problems. He died in 1975 at the age of 67.

Derek Newark, who appears in episodes two to four of this initial story, appeared in Doctor Who again in 1970 at the time of the third Doctor in a story called ‘Inferno’. It was primarily directed by Douglas Camfield, who was assistant director to Waris Hussein on ‘An Unearthly Child’ and directed some of the second unit film inserts.

Review posted 26 April 2010


...

Star Trek (2009 film)

...

Rating 3¼


Directed by J J Abrams

Written by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, based on characters created by Gene Roddenberry


Starring Chris Pine (James T Kirk), Zachary Quinto (Spock), Karl Urban (Leonard ‘Bones’ McCoy), Zoe Saldana (Nyota Uhura), John Cho (Hikaru Sulu), Anton Yelchin (Pavel Chekov), Simon Pegg (Montgomery ‘Scotty’ Scott), Eric Bana (Captain Nero), Chris Greenwood (Christopher Pike), Ben Cross (Sarek), Wynona Ryder (Amanda Grayson), Chris Hemsworth (George Samuel Kirk) and Leonard Nimoy (Spock)


When Starfleet receives a distress signal from the planet Vulcan, cadets are mobilised for active service on awaiting starships. Commander Spock is assigned to the starship USS Enterprise, which is captained by Christopher Pike. A junior Starfleet physician, Dr Leonard ‘Bones’ McCoy, smuggles aboard his friend James T Kirk, a rebellious cadet who has been suspended from active duty following a charge brought against him by Spook. As the Enterprise travels at warp speed towards the stricken planet, Kirk realises that something is seriously wrong and it is somehow connected to the death of his father many years earlier.

...


Development on ‘Star Trek’ began in early 2005. The last Star Trek film, ‘Nemesis’, had been released in December 2002 to generally unenthusiastic reviews and grossed a little over $67 million at the box office against a production budget of $60 million. The last (to date) television series, ‘Star Trek: Enterprise’, ran for four seasons, but suffered from sharply declining audience figures before coming to an end in May 2005. ‘Star Trek’ was intended to “re-boot” the franchise, going right back to the beginning to tell the story of how the original characters first met and became the crew of the starship USS Enterprise.

The “re-boot” was placed in the hands of ‘Lost’ co-creators and producers J J Abrams (who directed the film) and Damon Lindelof. The screenplay was written by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, who, alongside Abrams, are the co-creators of the television series ‘Fringe’. The film utilised extensive state of the art special effects and had a production budget of $150 million. It grossed a little over $385 million at the box office. Its domestic gross a little under £258 million placed it at No.7 in the yearly list for 2009.

I am not a devoted fan of Star Trek. I watched the original iconic late-1960s television series as a child and teenager and loved it. There was a time when I watched ‘Next Generation’ regularly, but that is many years ago and I am perhaps not as keen on it in retrospective. I can take or leave ‘Deep Space Nine’; I don’t mind watching the occasional episode, but it is not something I would wish to watch regularly. I didn’t like ‘Voyager’ very much and missed out on ‘Enterprise’ altogether. I have seen most, but not necessarily all of the various feature films and oddly the one that probably stands out most for me is ‘Nemesis’, which was not universally well received.

There are all manner of ways in which ‘Star Trek’ could have been a monumental disaster, but it proved to be anything but; not only performing well (if not spectacularly) at the box office, but also garnering good reviews from critics. 279 reviews collected at Rotten Tomatoes result in a 94% fresh rating. I don’t know what reaction was like amongst “Trekkers” (or “Trekkies”), but while the nature of fandom dictates that there was probably plenty of criticism, I am not aware of any widespread backlash against the film.

It’s not perfect. The special effects are extremely impressive, but an over-abundance of effects and constant in-your-face frenetic action sequences are not to all tastes. It can become exhausting and the depiction of Kirk as almost super-human, apparently able to withstand any amount of punishment, does wear out its welcome after a while. The film tumbles into extreme schmaltz on several occasions, but this is actually quite affecting, more so than nauseating, which it so easily could have been. I wasn’t sure what to make of the relationship of Spock and Uhura. I don’t know where that came from, but I guess I must have forgotten something from the original television series.

What most struck me was the near-perfect casting of the main characters, with one notable exception. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, in particular, give performances that, while they are not impersonations, are scarily accurate. Pine, without attempting to duplicate William Shatner’s inimitable acting style, is sensational, although ultimately it is perhaps Quinto who steals the film. Each actor, it seems, was free to take elements from the performances of the original actors and incorporate these into their own interpretation of the role. It works superbly well. The one exception, I thought, was Simon Pegg as Scotty, which is a pity because I like Simon Pegg a lot.

I must admit I did struggle with the film during the first twenty or thirty minutes. It was slipping into boredom for me and the two-dimensional portrayal of Kirk as a troubled and rebellious child/teenager/young man almost had me reaching for the off button. However, things improved as soon as they were on the Enterprise. Leonard Nimoy’s appearance as Spock is beautifully incorporated into the story, although as the film closes and we hear those famous words, “Space... the Final Frontier,” I just think they should have been spoken by William Shatner, not Nimoy.

I wasn’t sure what to expect and I was very pleasantly surprised.

Review posted 20 April 2010


...

Doctor Who: Victory of the Daleks

...

Rating 2


Written by Mark Gatiss

Directed by Andrew Gunn

Starring Matt Smith (The Doctor), Karen Gillan (Amelia ‘Amy’ Pond), Ian McNeice (Winston Churchill), Bill Patterson (Professor Edwin Bracewell), Tim Wallers (Captain Childers), Susannah Fielding (Lillian), Nina de Cosimo (Blanche) and Colin Procktor (ARP Warden)



The Doctor receives a call from Winston Churchill and the TARDIS materialises in the cabinet war rooms beneath London. The British have a new secret weapon in their war against the Nazis; “ironsides” invented and built by Professor Edwin Bracewell. The Doctor instantly recognises these new weapons as Daleks and desperately attempts to warn Churchill of the deadly danger he has unleashed, while trying to unravel Bracewell’s motivation for his apparent deception and discover the secret plan of the Daleks.

...


The third episode of season five of the revived series brings back the Doctor’s most deadly and iconic adversaries, the Daleks. I am not particularly a fan of the Daleks and I do feel, as do others, that they are in danger of becoming overused. They first appeared in a Doctor Who story called ‘The Daleks’ (or ‘The Mutants’) in December 1963. They appeared in sixteen stories in total in the so-called “classic series”, making their final appearance in ‘Remembrance of the Daleks’ in October 1988. This is their sixth appearance since the revival of the series in 2005.

I always look forward to a new Doctor Who episode, but perhaps the Dalek episodes are not amongst my favourites. However, Phelim O’Neill wrote in the Guardian about ‘Victory of the Daleks’, “Many are fearing the return of the overused Daleks for all the wrong reasons. Tonight should see those same doubters eagerly awaiting their next appearance... This is the new Doctor’s first outright classic episode.” I also noticed that the episode was written by Mark Gatiss. This made me go in with much higher expectations, but in the end I came away slightly disappointed. It was another fairly typical Dalek episode. It was quite enjoyable in a frenetic kind of way, but it was flawed. I don’t think it was a classic and ultimately I found it rather unsatisfying.

The premise was an interesting one, but it needed more than 45 minutes to tell the story. It felt rushed to me and I continue to believe that it isn’t necessary for every single story to be told at such a frenetic pace. It is all a bit exhausting.

Once the Doctor has established what the Daleks are planning the story does start to unravel a little bit. There has been criticism of the Dalek ship, but surely the slightly comical no-expense-spent DIY look of it was deliberate. My initial reaction to the preposterous sight of the Spitfires attacking the spaceship in outer space beyond the atmosphere of the planet Earth (in what I take to be a nod towards the climactic scenes in the original ‘Star Wars’ film) was to find it quite insulting in its stupidity. However, it was clearly intended with tongue firmly in cheek and the silliness and humour of it all should be greeted with a smile. There has been criticism about the somewhat anti-climactic ending, but clearly this is just a prelude to another story, presumably to be told at the end of this season.

The crack in time witnessed in the opening episode of season five has now reappeared at the close of the next two episodes, signalling that something similar to the “Bad Wolf” story-arc of season one is coming.

Ian McNeice gives a broad impersonation of Churchill and unlike some fans I didn’t mind the implication that he and the Doctor are old friends, despite there being no suggestion of that in the history of the series before now. I do, however, appreciate that the portrayal of someone as complex and contentious as Churchill as a genial old cove is considerably wide of the mark. It was nice to see Bill Patterson – and Professor Bracewell proved to be a effective character. However, where Russell T Davies was a master of bringing life to even the most peripheral characters and inhabiting them with real emotional resonance, it is perhaps something this new season is going to lack.

‘Victory of the Daleks’ contained some very nice touches and the story was given extra frisson by the knowledge that when Terry Nation first created the Daleks 47 years ago he based them on the Nazis. Having said that, I do not imagine it is destined to become one of my favourites and I don’t think it is the “outright classic” suggested by Phelim O’Neill. I have given the episode a rating of two, which acknowledges the high standards of the series in general and my own high expectations of it.

Early indications are that ‘Victory of the Daleks’ was watched by an audience in the region of 6.2 million viewers, just under 33% of the total television audience during that timeslot. Although this is not an exceptional result, it is still a very strong showing.

Review posted 18 April 2010


...

Life

...

Rating 2½


Created by Rand Ravich

Writers: Rafael Alvarez, Laurie Arent, Wendolyn Calhoun, R J Colleary, Marjorie David, Scott M Gimple, Joe Hortua, David Manson, Glen Mazzara, Rand Ravich, Melissa Scrivner, Jonathan Shapiro, Far Shariat

Directors: Adam Arkin, John Behring, John Dahl, Holly Dale, Tucker Gates, Elodie Keene, Fred Keller, Peter Markle, Paul McCrane, Daniel Sackheim, David Semel, Marcos Siega, David Straiton, Lawrence Thrilling, Jay Torres, Tony Wharmby

Starring Damian Lewis (Detective Charlie Crews), Sarah Shahi (Detective Dani Reese), Adam Arkin (Ted Earley), Brent Sexton (Officer Bobby Stark), Donal Logue (Captain Kevin Tidwell), Robin Weigert (Lt Sgt Karen Davis), Jessy Schram (Rachel Seybolt), Victor Rivers (Jack Reese), Garret Dillahunt (Roman Nevikov), Shashawnee Hall (Special Agent Paul Bodner), Roger Aaron Brown (Carl Ames), Jennifer Siebel (Jennifer Conover), Titus Welliver (Titus Hollis), Brooke Langton (Constance Griffiths), Christina Hendricks (Olivia Canton), Gabrielle Union (Detective Jane Seever) and Helen McCrory (Amanda Puryer)


LAPD uniform police officer Charlie Crews is wrongly convicted of a double murder and spends twelve years in high security prisons. When the conviction is quashed and he is released he receives a $50 million compensation settlement and is reinstated in the LAPD as a homicide detective. He is assigned Detective Dani Reese, who harbours her own problems, as his partner and begins an unofficial investigation to identify the people who framed up, an investigation that leads him to his partner’s father, retired LAPD police caption Jack Reese.

...


‘Life’ was an NBC police drama broadcast across two seasons and a total of 32 episodes between 26 September 2007 and 8 April 2009, at which point NBC announced that it would not return for a third season. It starred the acclaimed and skilled English actor Damian Lewis, who had previously made an impact on American television in the 2001 mini-series ‘Band of Brothers’, and Sarah Shahi, who is perhaps otherwise best known for her role in seasons two and three of the television drama series ‘The L Word’. The English stage actress Helen McCrory, the wife of Damian Lewis, had a recurring role in season two of the show. ‘Life’ was created by Rand Ravich, the writer/director of the 1999 Johnny Depp film ‘The Astronaut’s Wife’

It is standard practice that all American network police procedurals come with a quirk; something that is intended to make each one stand out against the others in what is otherwise a very formulaic genre. ‘Life’ came with an overabundance of quirks and that, perhaps, was partly its downfall. Charlie Crews had so many tics and idiosyncrasies that he made even Dr Gregory House (from the hugely and I think inexplicably popular television medical drama ‘House’) seem positively mundane. To add to an already bursting to the seams collection of quirks displayed by Crews, his partner Dani Reese was a recovering drug addict and alcoholic with a major chip on her shoulder and Kevin Tidwell, the captain of their homicide division (in season two of the show), had an eccentric personality and an unpredictable approach to his job. The basic premise of the show, of course, was already patently ridiculous, but it was compounded by too much silliness and too many characters who were written out without proper explanation.

Crews was a Zen-like character who bought himself a huge house in the hills and seemed to be addicted to very fast and very expensive cars, but who had no furniture in his house because he claimed his life was not ruled by possessions or material things. He obsessively ate fruit of all kinds and varieties and constantly expressed childlike wonder at technological advances that had occurred while he was in prison. He was a very high profile and contentious figure in the LAPD, one that was potentially very embarrassing for them, so they assigned him a partner who was a recovering drug-addict and alcoholic with some serious issues of her own. The silliness was piled on thick and fast.

Throughout the first season and the first half of season two Crews was obsessed with his former wife, constantly harassing her new husband and ultimately breaking down her defences and persuading her to sleep with him. It was a pointless and grating sub-plot and neither character was seen or mentioned again afterwards. The defence attorney who continued to work for twelve years to have the conviction quashed and Crews released from prison and who seemed to be an important figure in his life was suddenly written out of the show without warning. Crews was obsessed with finding his god-daughter, the daughter of the friends he was wrongly convicted of murdering. When he finally did track her down, he brought her to stay with him. Subsequently, he decided it was not safe for her and sent her away. She was not seen or mentioned again. In the first season the homicide division Crews was assigned to was headed up by a character who proved to be a decidedly uninteresting presence and was summarily written out at the start of season two and replaced with a new character. The rather sudden disappearance of Jack Reese in season two was treated with far too little concern by characters who should have taken much more interest in his absence, until a rather clunky explanation for his disappearance was provided in the final episodes.

I found the sudden departure of Dani Reese from the main storyline during the closing episodes of season two rather strange. The reasons given for this and her brief appearances in subsequent episodes didn’t work very well for me to explain what was going on. It was only after I had finished watching the season and read about the background of the show that I discovered that the actress Sarah Shahi was pregnant. Initially, the character Bobby Stark was temporarily promoted upwards to become Crews’ new partner and I thought that worked quite well, but after a couple of episodes he was suddenly replaced, for no obvious reason.

The necessity to make allowances for Sarah Shahi’s pregnancy is understandable, but there seems to have been far too many other instances of the writers simply changing their minds about a character or storyline. This is not altogether uncommon in the early stages of American network shows, but surely not usually to this degree?

The premise, as I have already mentioned, was preposterous and the season-wide conspiracy story-arc in season two became increasingly convoluted, to the point where, except for the absence of aliens, it was almost heading into ‘The X-Files’ territory. I was, I should mention, reasonably diverted by this storyline, although it was ultimately rushed to a somewhat unconvincing conclusion (perhaps because the writers knew that show was not coming back and wanted to tie up some loose ends).

There were as many problems in the show as good points, perhaps more, and I really struggled to get past the first episode, which I found monumentality irritating. However, for all the faults and for all of my criticisms, I did end up enjoying it, although whether or not I’d want to watch the whole thing again is another matter entirely.

The opening episode of ‘Life’ attracted an audience of 10.15 million viewers on NBC. The low point was the eighteenth episode of the second season, which was watched by 4.22 million viewers. The final episode attracted 4.5 million viewers. The first season of the show was disrupted by the Writers Guild of America strike and only eleven episodes were made, although twenty-two had been commissioned. Several writers did not return for the second season, which ran to twenty-one episodes.

Review posted 17 April 2010


...

Meteor Storm

...

Rating 1


Directed by Tibor Takács

Written by Peter Mohan

Starring Michael Trucco (Colonel Tom Young), Kari Matchett (Dr Michelle Young), Kirsten Prout (Kara Young), Brett Dier (Jason Young), Eric Johnson (Kyle Pember), Lara Gilchrist (Lena), Emily Holmes (Laura), Travis Nelson (Brad), Kevein McNulty (General Brock) and Viv Leacock (Colonel Jack Clancey)



San Francisco prepares for what should be a spectacular meteor shower speeding across the night sky. Astro-physicist Dr Michelle Young is angry when her estranged husband Tom forgets to collect their two teenage children, Kara and Jason, to bring them to see the display. However, instead of the spectacular display everyone was expecting, this is the first of a series of deadly meteor storms that threatens to destroy San Francisco and wipe out the population. Michelle and Tom have to put their difference aside to work with the US Military to find a solution – and rescue their kids.

...


I am not a regular viewer of the Sci-Fi Channel, but I have watched enough “SyFy” movies to know exactly what to expect and yet I still cannot stop myself from hoping that the next one I watch will not be as laughably bad as the last one. So it was with ‘Meteor Storm’, which I watched because it stars Kari Matchett. This isn’t the worst example I have seen, but it was just a jumble of ridiculous clichés and pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo.

Michael Trucco, who starred in ‘Battlestar Gallactica, which I have never seen a single episode of, is the all-action hero here. We know this because he wears a leather jacket and rides around on a Harley. When he is not riding the Harley he is driving around in a Hummer. He rescues a pregnant woman from an overturned vehicle just seconds before it blows up. He rescues his wife from a downed helicopter – just seconds before it blows up. He rescues his children, who are trapped in an elevator, and his daughter’s boyfriend, who is sick and trapped in an apartment, just moments before the entire building collapses. However, to show that he’s only human, he fails to save his wife’s sister, who is driving across the Golden Gate Bridge when it is hit and destroyed by a meteor storm. As it happens, something that is conveniently overlooked, she would probably have safely got to the other side had it not been for Michelle calling her on her cell-phone while she was driving and screaming at her to get off the bridge, something that caused her to crash.

I cannot be too critical because it is not as if I do not know exactly what to expect when I watch these things, but ‘Meteor Storm’ leaves no cliché overlooked and has no sense of humour to alleviate the grimness of it all. It’s competently made, but wholly unimaginative.

Review posted 12 April 2010


...

Mannequin

...

Rating 2


Directed by Michael Gottileb

Written by Michael Gottileb and Edward Rugoff

Starring Andrew McCarthy (Jonathan Switcher), Kim Cattrall (Emmy Hasure), Carole Davis (Roxie Shield), James Spader (Mr Richards), G W Bailey (Captain Felix Maxwell), Cristopher Maher (Armand), Steve Vinovich (B J Wert) and Estelle Getty (Mrs Claire Timkin)



Jonathan Switcher goes through a succession of dead end jobs until one day a mannequin he created comes to life and his life is transformed. He finds work creating displays in a department store, but soon finds himself in conflict with his girlfriend Roxie, the store’s Vice-president Mr Richards and its officious and incompetent security guard Felix Maxwell. He falls in love with the dummy, a woman from ancient Egypt called Emahauser, who only comes to life when she can be seen by no one else but him. His displays cause a sensation and he becomes a target for the owner of a rival department store.

...


‘Mannequin’ is a 1987 romcom. Everything about the film screams the 1980s and that is a decade I continue to struggle with. Such an outlook makes it difficult to view a film like this with anything approaching an objective response, although as time moves on I am beginning to feel less anger about the horror of Thatcherism, perhaps because what has subsequently occurred has proved to be a kind of watered-down and deceitful version of it, which has been, if anything, even more repulsive and damaging. The film is a typical product of its time, a shallow decade of ostentatious greed that at least had its own very distinctive identity. What we are left with now, seemingly a result of that decade, is pastiche and rampant greed that has gone so far out of control there is no pulling it back.

There is not much to be said about ‘Mannequin’. It’s a silly, kitschy and, in retrospect, almost endearing film that stands the test of time as a harmless artefact of its period. Andrew McCarthy was one of the so-called “Brat Pack” and his other hit films from the era include ‘St Elmo’s Fire’ and ‘Pretty in Pink’. Fans of ‘Sex in the City’ may find some interest in the presence of Kim Cattrall in one of her earlier roles. Estelle Getty (‘The Golden Girls’) and G W Bailey (the ‘Police Academy’ films) also feature and there is a truly awful performance by James Spader.

‘Mannequin’ was not popular with critics, but it grossed nearly $43 million at the domestic box office, more than ‘Pretty in Pink’ the previous year. It is No.27 in the domestic gross list for 1987, one place behind ‘Wall Street’ and one in front of the Steve Martin and Daryl Hannah comedy ‘Roxanne’.

A sequel, ‘Mannequin: On the Move’, starring Kristy Swanson, followed in 1991.

Review posted 12 April 2010


...

Doctor Who: The Beast Below

...

Rating 2¾


Written by Steven Moffat

Directed by Andrew Gunn

Starring Matt Smith (The Doctor), Karen Gillan (Amelia ‘Amy’ Pond), Sophie Okonedo (Liz Ten), Hannah Sharp (Mandy), Alfie Field (Timmy), Terrence Hardiman (Hawthorne), Christopher Good (Mo
rgan) and David Ajala (Peter)


This is Amy’s first journey in the TARDIS. The Doctor takes her far into the future to a spacecraft that look like a skyline of skyscrapers suspended in space, each one bearing the name of a different English county. He says this is what remains of the United Kingdom of Britain and Northern Ireland after the planet Earth was destroyed by solar flares, although it does not include Scotland because the Scottish people wanted their own ship. They discover a young girl who is crying and yet being ignored by all those around her and the Doctor tells Amy to find out why the girl is upset. He also wants her to find out more about the strange painted “fairground” heads that sit motionless in glass-fronted booths. Meanwhile, he goes off to investigate why there is not even the faintest hint of vibration on the giant spacecraft and discovers it has no engine. During these investigations he encounters Liz Ten, the incumbent British monarch, who already knows who he is.

...


‘The Beast Below’ is the second episode of the fifth season of the revived series and the second episode to feature the new doctor and companion. As was the case with the opening episode, ‘The Eleventh Hour’, it was written by Steven Moffat, who has assumed the role of head writer and executive producer following the departure of Russell T Davies.

This is an episode that contains many of the classic elements of Doctor Who and mirrors several themes already seen in the revived series, including the underlying alien nature of the Doctor and the consequences of the burden he is constantly required to shoulder. It contains some memorable moments, but on first viewing I came away from it with a sense of déjà vu. Somehow it just felt like we’d seen all this before and the episode as a whole was slightly underwhelming. Some fans have already noted the similarity to the episode ‘The Long Game’ in the first season of the revived series. There are also clear links back to ‘The Idiot Lantern’ in season two and, in terms at least of the subtext drawing a parallel with the political landscape of Britain, perhaps even a comparison to ‘The Happiness Patrol’ from the Sylvester McCoy era of the late 1980s.

There is an amusing little joke about Scotland – the character Amelia Pond is Scottish, as is Karen Gillan, the actress who plays her, and indeed Steven Moffat. There is also a cleverly timed statement about elections and voting and the fact that the right to protest in this country has been greatly eroded in the lifetime of the current government. The Doctor tellingly comments, “Once every five years everyone chooses to forget what they’ve learned – democracy in action”, and at one point directly refers to the Britain of the far future as displaying all the signs of a police state.

Centre stage is largely given over to Amy to further establish this character. The early signs are very positive and I am inclined to say that Karen Gillan may prove to be the best companion since Bille Piper. Matt Smith has also quickly settled into the role of the Doctor and entertainingly so, although it is too early to judge how he will ultimately compare to his ten predecessors. The character Liz Ten did not work at all for me and the other characters unique to the episode are too sketchy to make much impact, none of them occupying much more than a few minutes of screen time, although the 12-year-old Mandy is actually a quite effective character, being very aware of what is happening around her, unlike the adults who bury their heads in the sand and ignore her, partly because she is a child and partly because she is not yet old enough to vote.

At the moment I suspect my expectations of the fifth season is creating a sense of anti-climax. With a new Doctor, a new companion, a new head writer and new producers I was hoping for a change of direction, a new approach to the series. However, what we seem to have is a rehash of what we’ve already seen during the previous five years. Time will tell, of course, and there are still eleven episodes remaining in this new season. ‘The Beast Below’ may well be an episode that improves with repeated viewings, but my initial reaction is one of slight disappointment.

Additional: Having watched the episode for a second time my opinion about the character Liz Ten remains unchanged, but overall I thought it was much better than my initial reaction to it suggested and it certainly deserves a nod for the use of the word “minging”.

Review posted 11 April 2010


...

Quatermass II

...

Rating 2¾


Directed by Val Guest

Written by Nigel Kneale and val Guest, based on the original BBC serial written by Nigel Kneale

Starring Brian Donlevy (Professor Bernard Quatermass), John Longden (Inspector Lomax), Sid James (Jimmy Hall), William Franklyn (Brand), Bryan Forbes (Marsh), Vera Day (Sheila), Charles Lloyd Pack (Dawson), Percy Herbert (Gorman), Michael Ripper (Ernie) and Jogn Rae (McLeod)


Professor Bernard Quatermass is angry after his request for more funds for his planned exploration of the Moon is rejected, but he is intrigued by the meteorite shower his team has been tracking and by the sample they have analysed. He travels to Winnerden Flats, the area where the meteorites were concentrated and discovers what appears to be a fully-functioning replica of his planned Moon base. His colleague Marsh is badly burned by ammonia gas from one of the fallen rocks that leaves a strange V shape mark on his skin. Quatermass is warned away by armed guards and when he is given a hostile reception in the nearby town he goes to Inspector Lomax at Scotland Yard for help investigating the true purpose of the secret base.

...


‘The Quatermass Xperiment’ in 1955 was a Hammer Films production based on the 1953 BBC television serial. The commercial success of that film resulted in ‘Quatermass II’ in 1957, also based on a BBC serial. Nigel Kneale, who wrote the BBC serials, was involved in writing the screenplay this time around, with input by producer Anthony Hinds and subsequent re-writes by the director Val Guest. The American actor Brian Donlevy returned as Bernard Quatermass, much to Kneale’s annoyance, who considered him, quite rightly, to be miscast in the role. Kneale also claimed that Donlevy was an alcoholic who was paralytic on the set and could barely read his lines off the idiot boards that were being used because he was incapable of memorising them. Guest claimed that these allegations were not true, saying Donlevy was very professional, although he did concede that the actor laced his coffee with whisky and was “not stone cold sober either”.

Donlevy was cast as a deliberate ploy to make the ‘Quatermass’ films more appealing to American distributors. He is not a perfect match for the role, but not a bad one, and his performance is fine. If he really was “crippled with drink” as Nigel Kneale claimed it doesn’t show. Reginald Tate had played the lead role in the first BBC serial, but following his sudden death in 1955 he was replaced at short notice by John Robinson for the second serial. The role was played by André Morell in the third BBC serial and subsequently by Andrew Keir, John Mills and Jason Flemyng.

The film rattles along at a brisk pace and doesn’t suffer for the general absence of special effects. A Shell oil-refinery doubled as the secret complex where the aliens are plotting their colonisation of Earth. We do not see the alien creatures until the final moments of the film and then only through the gloom of night cover. They are typical of the period, not at all convincing and yet somehow more effective than many of today’s state-of-the-art CGI effects. Fans of the ‘Carry On’ films would perhaps be interested to see Sid James in one of his earlier non-comic roles.

‘Quatermass II’ has been widely interpreted as an attack on the Conservative government at the time.

Review posted 7 April 2010


...

Jonathan Creek: The Judas Tree

...

Rating 2


Written and directed by David Renwick

Starring Alan Davies (Jonathan Creek), Sheridan Smith (Joey Ross), Paul McGann (Hugo Dore), Sasha Behar (Harriet Dore), Natalie Walter (Emily Somerton), Doreen Mantle (Mrs Gantry), Ian McNeice (Father Roderick Alberic), Florence Hall (Young Emily), Susanne Ahmet (Kim) and Stuart Milligan (Adam Klaus)


Emily Somerton is hired to help the aging housekeeper of a large house where a mysterious and still unexplained death occurred more than a hundred years previously. Emily suffers from a nervous disposition following a strange incident several years earlier when she saw a house that seemed to disappear and was then attacked by an old man slithering through the long grass in the field where the vanishing house had stood. Her state of mind is made more fragile by strange happenings in the house where she has gone to work and live and she asks self-styled psychic investigator Joey Ross for help, who in turn involves Jonathan Creek. Before long they are desperately trying to solve the puzzle and prove Emily innocent of the charge of murder.

...


‘Jonathan Creek’ ran for four seasons and 25 episodes on BBC1 between May 1997 and February 2004, attracting an audience as big as 11.5 million viewers. Each episode was written by David Renwick, who is otherwise best known for the often surreal sitcom ‘One Foot in the Grave’, which subverted the form with some inspired black comedy. Renwick also dramatised four episodes of ‘Agatha Christie’s Poirot’ starring David Suchet in the early 1990s, amongst his portfolio of other work.

Following a gap of nearly five years, a new episode of ‘Jonathan Creek’ was broadcast at New Year 2009, attracting an audience just shy of 10 million, and now after a further lengthy break comes another “special”, broadcast at Easter 2010, with the promise of more to come.

Jonathan Creek designs illusions for a cheesy and amoral stage magician called Adam Klaus, the only other character to have been featured in the whole of the series. Creek also solves seemingly unsolvable mysteries, placing the emphasis on discovering how something was done and not the identity of the perpetrator. Klaus is not involved in these mysteries and his presence in the series is for comic purposes. For example, in an irreverent and irrelevant sub-plot in ‘The Judas Tree’ he becomes the victim of an online prankster and is painted as a racist. Klaus is not racist; he is simply entirely self-absorbed. The role of Adam Klaus was played in the very first episode by Anthony Head, whose future involvement after that was presumably curtailed by ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’. Stuart Milligan assumed the role in the first episode of the second season in January 1998.

Creek’s foil was initially an investigative writer called Maggie Magellan (played by Caroline Quentin), who would quite happily lie and use dishonesty in pursuit of material for her books. She frequently involved a reluctant Creek in her investigations and they had an on-off sexual relationship. Quentin played this role in the first three seasons up to January 2000. There was no new season in 2001 or 2002, but Julia Sawalha made her first appearance in the Christmas 2001 special, playing Carla Borrego, a theatrical agent. Sawalha became a regular cast member in season four in 2003, by which time her character had married and become the presenter of a real-life crime show on television. Her husband was played by the comic actor, writer and musician Adrian Edmondson, whose frequent on-screen partner Ric Mayall had guest starred in a season two episode.

Following the five-year hiatus, Sheridan Smith made her first appearance in the January 2009 special, playing Joey Ross, and has repeated that role in ‘The Judas Tree’. Smith is probably best known for the sitcom ‘Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps’. Her other television work includes the comedy-drama series ‘Love Soup’, which was created and written by David Renwick.

David Renwick has said one of the reasons he stopped writing ‘Jonathan Creek’ after the fourth season was that it was becoming increasingly hard to think up new puzzles and mysteries for his title character to solve. His reason for bringing the character back was largely because the only other viable option was to retire, unless he attempted to create an entirely new show, something he says he does not have the energy for. ‘The Judas Tree’ does seem to indicate that his powers are waning. Although it starts quite brightly, the story never really goes anywhere and there is very little for Jonathan to ponder. Worst of all, the twisty ending is very sloppy and undefined. Jonathan does not solve the puzzle at all, although he has put most of the pieces in place, and it has to be explained to him, following which it is not entirely clear how it all ends.

Having said that, Jonathan has always been a likeable character, albeit one with a mixture of detached reticence and off-hand arrogance, and the one-time stand-up comedian Alan Davies is a perfect fit for the role, although he was not the first choice. A number of other actors had been approached and at one point Hugh Lawrie was signed to the project before Davies was eventually hired. Sheridan Smith has also, I think, proved to be a successful addition to the cast. She does, of course, have the advantage that she has not immediately succeeded Caroline Quentin and it is now ten years since Quentin left the show.

Familiarity and likeability work in favour of ‘The Judas Tree’, which is otherwise a rather weak and undistinguished addition to the list of ‘Jonathan Creek’ episodes. The symbolic significance of the Judas tree that perpetually fails to flower remains somewhat elusive.

Review posted 6 April 2010


...

Doctor Who: The Two Doctors

...

Rating 3


Written by Robert Holmes

Directed by Peter Moffatt

Starring Colin Baker (The Doctor), Patrick Troughton (The Doctor), Nicola Bryant (Perpugilliam ‘Peri’ Brown), Frazer Hines (Jamie McCrimmon), Jacqueline Pearce (Chessene), Laurence Payne (Dastari), John Stratton (Shockeye), James Saxon (Oscar) and Carman Gomez (Anita)


The second Doctor is sent by the Time Lords, taking his companion Jamie with him, to put a stop to experiments in time travel being conducted under the auspices of a brilliant scientist called Dastari. The Doctor is concerned by biological “augmentations” Dastari has made to a morally-corrupt and bestial alien species known as the Androgum, in particular Chessene, who now possesses a genius intellect. His initial attempts at negotiations with Dastari end badly, but before he can repair the diplomatic damage done he becomes caught up in a raid by the Sontarans. The sixth Doctor collapses in the TARDIS when he has a vision of the violent death of an earlier incarnation of himself. He and his companion Peri follow a trail of clues that eventually lead them to a hacienda in the south of Spain where the second Doctor is being held captive.

...


I chanced to watch ‘The Two Doctors’ recently quite by accident. The Sc-Fi Channel was having a “Doctor Who Easter Weekend”, showing episodes from what is commonly referred to as the “classic series”. I wasn’t aware of this, but came across it while aimlessly channel surfing the day after ‘The Eleventh Hour’, the opening episode of the new Doctor Who series, had been broadcast by the BBC.

I probably watched some Doctor Who episodes in the era of the first Doctor, William Hartnell, and I was definitely watching at the time of the second Doctor, Patrick Troughton, but it was during the time of Jon Pertwee that it became my favourite television show. Pertwee was the third Doctor and played the role between January 1970 and June 1974. I continued to watch regularly for the next ten years when the role was played by Tom Baker and Peter Davison, but I was beginning to flag by the time of the arrival of Colin Baker as the sixth Doctor in March 1984. I certainly watched some of his first season and, I think, bits of the second season, but I don’t have any particularly vivid memories of any of it. Watching ‘The Two Doctors’ did not bring back any memories at all, so it is quite possible I had not previously seen it.

This was not the first time the Doctor had encountered a previous incarnation of himself. ‘The Three Doctors’ in December 1972 and January 1973 marked the tenth anniversary of the show and brought Jon Pertwee, Patrick Troughton and William Hartnell together. The twentieth anniversary was marked by ‘The Five Doctors’ in November 1983, with Peter Davison joined by Tom Baker (little more than a cameo appearance pieced together from old unused footage after he had declined to be involved), Jon Pertwee, Patrick Troughton and Richard Hurdnall, standing in for William Hartnell, who died in 1975. Hurdnall himself died just a few months after ‘The Five Doctors’ was first broadcast. Unlike those two stories, ‘The Two Doctors’ did not mark an anniversary.

This was a troubled time for Doctor Who. Michael Grade, who became Controller of BBC1 in 1984, made no attempt to hide the fact that he detested the show, calling it “rubbish” and “pathetic”. There was a gap of eighteen months between the end of the first season with Colin Baker in the lead role and the start of the second season, at the end of which Grade sacked Baker, calling his performance, “Utterly unlikeable, absolutely god-awful in fact.”

Although long-term fans of Doctor Who have often been critical of the quality of the episodes during this period, Colin Baker has been defended with increasing regularity and his portrayal of the Doctor seems to have found more and more fans over the years. Baker himself, in my limited experience, has been very gracious about the whole experience and certainly appears to hold no ill-will towards the character or the show itself.

Prior to the arrival of Colin Baker, each Doctor Who story had been shown in multiples of 25-minute episodes, usually four or six. The episodes were now 45-minutes in length and ‘The Two Doctors’ was shown across three episodes between 16 February and 2 March 1985. It was written by Robert Holmes, who had been responsible for many Doctor Who stories, dating back to 1968 when Patrick Troughton portrayed the lead role. Troughton, whose time as the Doctor came to an end in June 1969, reprises his role here, alongside Frazer Hines, playing his companion Jamie, an 18th Century Scottish piper and Jacobite. By 1985 both Troughton and Hines were rather long-in-the-tooth for their characters, but strangely this does not prove to be much of a problem.

The story as it was first written was set largely in New Orleans, but when funding to film on location in the U.S. did not materialise this setting was changed to Spain, for no apparent reason. It’s a visually appealing setting, but seems to serve no purpose whatsoever and it doesn’t have any real bearing on the story. Robert Holmes, a vegetarian, intended the story as an allegory about meat eating and attitudes towards the treatment and slaughter of livestock, so perhaps the setting had some relevance in this respect that became lost in translation. The production in Spain was, apparently, plagued by all manner of technical problems.

The story is rather strange and some aspects of it are rather disquieting. The Androgum have no ethical grounding and although this is not always successfully projected, there are troubling moments, including what could be taken to be a representation of the attempted rape of Peri by Shockeye, a character who spends much of the two hours of running time wanting to cook and eat human flesh and who, because the point is laboured to breaking point, does become decidedly irritating as a result.

The two Doctors spend surprisingly little time on screen together and as such there is not much interaction between them, which does rather seem to the defeat the point of the exercise. The character Dastari, who seems to be a kind of updating of Dr Solon from an earlier Doctor Who story ‘The Brain of Morbius’, unfortunately wears a pair a glasses that make him look like a cross between Brains in ‘Thunderbirds’ and a member of The Buggles. This did make him rather difficult to take seriously. The Sontarans, adversaries of the Doctor that had been created by Robert Holmes and had been seen in three previous Doctor Who stories, are rather ineffectively used here. For all of these criticisms, there was something very likeable about the whole thing.

What surprised me most was how good Colin Baker was in the lead role and how much I liked Peri, the Doctor’s companion, portrayed by Nicola Bryant. I had always remembered her as a rather irritating character, but that was not the case here at all. In fact, she seemed rather spirited, even if quite clearly the character was intended to do little more than add a bit of “sex” to what was always a rather sexless show.

I enjoyed ‘The Two Doctors’ immensely, much to my surprise. It is not the best of Doctor Who and the story is a little threadbare, but watching it just 24 hours after ‘The Eleventh Hour’ I was struck by how good the show used to be. This is not intended as a criticism of the revived series, which I like very much, but it brought home to me again that I do find the constantly frenetic pace of the show now a little wearisome after a while.

Robert Holmes died in May 1986, having finished a draft of the first episode of the final story for the second and final season of Doctor Who featuring Colin Baker in the lead role.

Review posted 5 April 2010


...

Doctor Who: The Eleventh Hour

...

Rating 3


Written by Steven Moffat

Directed by Adam Smith

Starring Matt Smith (The Doctor), Karen Gillan (Amelia ‘Amy’ Pond), Arthur Darvill (Rory Williams), Annette Crosbie (Mrs Angelo), Tom Hopper (Jeff), Nina Wadia (Dr Ramsden), Marcello Magni (Barney Collins), Olivia Colman (Mother), Perry Benson (Ice Cream Man), Caitlin Blackwood (Amelia Pond as a child) and Patrick Moore (himself)


The newly regenerated Doctor is clinging to the outside of his TARDIS as it hurtles out of control and crashes into the garden of a house in the English countryside, where he encounters seven-year-old Amelia Pond. She is not scared of him or perturbed by his bizarre behaviour, but she tells him about a crack in her bedroom wall that frightens her. He investigates and discovers a crack in time and space, through which “Prisoner Zero” has escaped. Returning to his TARDIS, he tells Amelia he will be back in five minutes, but does not rematerialise again until twelve years later. Amy, as she is now known, is less than impressed with his tardiness, but they still have to deal with the alien creature that has been hiding in her house that whole time.

...


‘The Eleventh Hour’ marks the beginning of the new era of Doctor Who, introducing the eleventh Doctor, played by Matt Smith, and a new companion, played by Karen Gillan. Steven Moffat has assumed the role of Head Writer, taking over from the departing Russell T Davies. It also marks the arrival of Piers Wenger, who took over the role of Head of Drama at BBC Wales from Julie Gardner in January 2009.

The return of Doctor Who in March 2005 after what had more or less amounted to fifteen years in television wilderness, give or take the brief reign of the eighth Doctor, Paul McGann, in a not entirely successful film-length version in 1996, had seemed like a risky proposition. The decision of Russell T Davies to cast Christopher Eccleston in the lead role undoubtedly took some people by surprise, but it was surely not as contentious as his decision to cast Billie Piper as the Doctor’s companion. It proved to be a triumph, although Eccleston stood down after just one season and most fans seem to prefer his successor David Tennant.

Tennant played the role for three seasons, plus various “specials”, between December 2005 and December 2009, by which time I think the show was starting to feel a little tired and in need of some fresh ideas. To be clear, Russell T Davies did a remarkable job of resurrecting something that seemed to be dead and buried outside of a very loyal and long existing but decidedly entrenched fanbase. This fanbase continues to debate and argue with vehement intensity the merits or otherwise of the Davies era and the changes he brought to what remains the longest-surviving and possibly most successful sci-fi series in television history.

I am great supporter of Russell T Davies and I liked David Tennant as the Doctor, but I do think they chose the right time to step down. I hoped that Steven Moffat, who wrote ‘Blink’, which many fans would argue is the best episode of the RTD era, would take the show in a new direction. Having watched ‘The Eleventh Hour’, plus the clips of forthcoming episodes, I am not sure to what degree this is going to happen. For my own personal tastes, Doctor Who with David Tennant had latterly started to become rather too frenetic. The stories no longer had time to breathe; the Doctor had little time for reflection. If anything, Matt Smith seems to be an even more frenetic incarnation of the character. One television critic has already compared him to Jim Carrey.

I do appreciate that the Doctor Who of 2010 is made for quite a different audience to that of 1985 or 1975 or 1965. This is an audience brought up on computer games; in an era when celebrities are expected to “twitter” every minute of every day so that we can become their artificial “virtual” friends. I am clearly showing my age, but I do increasingly feel slightly out-of-step with a world in which everything is instant.

‘The Eleventh Hour’ draws on themes from previous Doctor Who episodes. An obvious example would be ‘The Girl in the Fireplace’, another Steve Moffat script, that took place during David Tennant’s first season in 2006. There is, perhaps, a slight sense of déjà-vu for this reason. The story felt like it quickly ran out of ideas, but to contradict myself somewhat, at the same time I think it would have benefited from being told across two episodes or as a 90-minute extended episode. I was impressed how quickly Matt Smith seems to have settled into the role, but it would have been nice to have spent a bit more time introducing this new Doctor and also his new companion and done so with a little less haste.

One criticism of the revived series that I have previously disagreed with really hit home here. The background music was very intrusive, especially in the opening scenes, rather taking away from the otherwise near perfect mix of humour and creepiness and the sense of claustrophobic foreboding that was clearly the intended ambience. Equally, the alien creature was uninteresting. Patrick Moore makes a pointless and uninvolving cameo apperance as himself, which is a bit of a letdown. However, of much more importance than any of this, I liked the new Doctor and the new companion.

Although not perfect, ‘The Eleventh Hour’ is a very good start to the new era and I am very interested to see how the series unfolds over the next twelve episodes leading up to the Christmas special in December 2010. It does seem that the Daleks and the Cybermen will be making an appearance in this new series, which I find disappointing. Personally, I think they could do with a rest, but then I have never particularly been a fan of either.

‘The Eleventh Hour’ was watched by an audience of appoximately 8 million viewers, nearly 37% of the total television audience in its timeslot.

Review posted 5 April 2010


...