Showing posts with label tv series. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tv series. Show all posts

Quatermass and the Pit (1958)

...

Rating *5*


Created and written by Nigel Kneale

Starring André Morell (Professor Bernard Quatermass), Cec Linder (Dr Matthew Roney), Antony Bushell (Colonel James Breen), John Stratton (Captain Potter), Christine Finn (Barbara Judd), Harold Goodwin (Corporal Gibson), Brian Worth (James Fullalove), Richard Shaw (Sladden), Hilda Barry (Mrs Anne Chilcot), Howell Davies (Mr Chilcot), Victor Platt (PC Ellis), Richard Dare (Private Secretary) and Michael Ripper (Sergeant)



A pre-human skull is discovered on building works in Hobbs Lane in Knightsbridge. Palaeontologist Dr Matthew Roney identifies it as a missing link, many thousands of years old, and obtains permission to carry out archaeological excavation of the site. However, when what appears to be a previously-unidentified unexploded World War II German missile is discovered, the site is closed off by an Army bomb disposal team. Roney asks his friend Professor Bernard Quatermass of the British Experimental Rocket Group to intercede on his behalf and they begin to piece together the terrible truth about the origins of the human species.

...


When I was growing up, the 1967 Hammer Films version of ‘Quatermass and the Pit’ was one of my favourite films. I guess I would first have watched it as a teenager sometime in the early to mid-1970s. I remain very fond of it. Like the two earlier Quatermass films made by Hammer, it was a remake of a 1950s BBC serial. ‘Quatermass and the Pit’ was the final one in the trilogy, broadcast in six 30-minute segments between 22 December 1958 and 26 January 1959, most of it performed live.

‘Quatermass and the Pit’ is a wildly acknowledged classic, possibly the single greatest example of British science fiction. It was hugely influential, both in style and theme. Doctor Who is a very obvious example of the influence of the Quatermass trilogy, but it extends much wider than just that.

It might be a little bit dated and stagey now, but science fiction does not get any better or more intelligent than this. The quality of the surviving print is also superior to the first two instalments in the trilogy, ‘The Quatermass Experiment’ (1953) and ‘Quatermass II’ (1955).


Review posted on 21 November 2010


...

Doctor Who: The Happiness Patrol

…

Rating: 2¼


Written by Graeme Curry

Directed by Chris Clough

Starring Sylvester McCoy (The Doctor), Sophie Aldred (Ace), Sheila Hancock (Helen A), Ronald Fraser (Joseph C), Harold Innocent (Gilbert M), Lesley Dunlop (Susan Q), Georgina Hale (Daisy K), Rachel Bell (Priscilla P), Jonathan Burn (Silas P), Tim Baker (Harold V), Richard D Sharp (Earl Sigma), John Normington (Trevor Sigma), Tim Scott (Forum Doorman) and David John Pope (Kandy Man)


The TARDIS materialises on the planet Terra Alpha. The Doctor has heard rumours of unrest amongst the human colony there and tells his companion Ace that they have a busy night ahead of them. They soon discover that unhappiness has been outlawed and large numbers of the population, those designated as “killjoys”, have disappeared. They also hear tales of a grotesque and frightening executioner known as the Kandy Man.

…


This is a very interesting one. At the time of first broadcast, Margaret Thatcher had been the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom for nine and a half years, with a another two years in office still remaining. For many of us living in Britain at that time it was a very dark period. Moving forward two decades, the new coalition government, led by Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron, talks meaningless nonsense about the “Big Society”, but Thatcher said “there is no such thing as society” and set about proving her contention by destroying it, a goal she more than succeeded in achieving. That quote, from an interview she gave in 1987, two years before coming to power, is rather taken out of context, but Thatcher was a malignant and destructive force, whose terrible impact is still being felt today, some twenty years after her own party prised her out of Downing Street.

The purpose of this rant? Although somewhat watered down by the time production was complete, ‘The Happiness Patrol’ was a less-than-complementary commentary about Margaret Thatcher and the Conservative government of the time. It is not hard to interpret the intended meaning behind a storyline in which freedom of expression is forcibly suppressed and demonstrations are crushed.

‘The Happiness Patrol’ was told across three 25-minutes episodes between 2 and 16 November 1988, during the second season to feature Sylvester McCoy in the role of the Doctor. This was the twenty-fifth season, all told, and McCoy was the seventh actor to play the lead role. The first thing one notices is how threadbare it looks. All three episodes are studio-bound and much of the action takes place on an obviously tiny and very fake set. It looks more like the set of an amateur play than a prime-time television series. The story itself is quite peculiar and although there are some very good actors here the whole thing is so odd and inexplicable that they are faced with overwhelming obstacles to overcome.

The next thing that most immediately stands out in these episodes is the Kandy Man, a sadistic psychotic killer robot that looks like a liquorice allsort and is thwarted by the Doctor not once but twice using lemonade. Bassett’s, the makers of liquorice allsorts, lodged an official complaint with the BBC, claiming, not unreasonably, that the Kandy Man was nothing more than a copy of “Bertie Bassett”, the company’s mascot. The BBC agreed not to use the Kandy Man again, which is actually a pity. The first instinct might be to laugh, but he is certainly memorable.

It did strike me how plodding and careless the direction seemed to be. It needed to make a virtue of the limitations, but failed to do so, although oddly the very fact that it was so derisory seems somehow appropriate. Perhaps that was the intention. Chris Clough directed six Doctor Who serials in total and has had a long career on British television as a director and producer.

This was the dog-end of the original series, as it wound down towards its inevitable cancellation, but strangely it was also a genuinely creative period. These final three seasons were not always successful, but they always strived to be inventive. ‘The Happiness Patrol’, which, apart from its commentary on Margaret Thatcher, also contains a very obvious gay subtext, runs out of steam before the end of the third episode, but for all of its very obvious faults it does remain quite fascinating as an allegorical tale of the time.

Review posted 3 June 2010


…

Doctor Who: Amy’s Choice

...

Rating 3¾


Written by Simon Nye

Directed by Catherine Morshead

Starring Matt Smith (The Doctor), Karen Gillan (Amy Pond), Arthur Darvill (Rory), Toby Jones (Dream Lord), Nick Hobbs (Mr Nainby), Joan Linder (Mrs Hamill) and Audrey Ardington (Mrs Poggit)


“If you can’t save him, then what is the point of you?”

The Doctor unexpectedly arrives in the small village of Upper Leadworth to visit Amy, who is heavily pregnant, and Rory, five years after they last travelled with him. All three fall asleep while sitting on a bench and wake up back in the TARDIS. It has, or so it seems, been a shared dream. They encounter a mysterious figure who has somehow managed to infiltrate the TARDIS. He calls himself the Dream Lord and tells them they must decide which reality is real. Death awaits them if they make the wrong choice.

...


‘Amy’s Choice’ is the seventh episode of the fifth season of the revived series. With the exception of the somewhat under-par ‘Victory of the Daleks’, the standard has been very high so far, closer to that of the first two seasons than the slightly tired latter stages of David Tennant’s time in the role, when the episodes, especially the “specials” broadcast in 2009, were becoming a little brash, if still just about the best thing on television.

Matt Smith settled into the lead role immediately. As has been commented elsewhere, he seems to have an uncanny ability to project the fact that although the Doctor now has the appearance of a young man and outwardly behaves as such, he is, in fact, extremely old and carries the weight of often painful and traumatic experience. Karen Gillan, also in her first season, has proved to be excellent and should be given extra points for getting the Daily Mail worked up into a froth of moral outrage. I like the character Rory and the performance of Arthur Darvill, but this character does seem to have been greeted with scepticism by many fans.

‘Amy’s Choice’ instantly became a favourite episode on first viewing and that didn’t change when I watched it for a second time. It put me in mind of episodes of ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’, in particular ‘Nightmares’ from the first season of that show, ‘Restless’, the inspired season four closer, and, to some degree, ‘Dead Things’, a dark and controversial episode from the sixth season. Although there is no reason to assume that ‘Amy’s Choice’ drew any direct inspiration from these episodes, it would not be the first time the revived series has been influenced by Buffy. Former executive producer and head writer Russell T Davies never hid his love of that show or his admiration for Joss Whedon.

The episode is very cleverly pieced together, as the Doctor and his two companions move between two possible realities – one inside a dead TARDIS, where they are rapidly freezing to death, and the other in what initially appears to by an idyllic rural setting, one that the Doctor thinks is “boring” and then very quickly realises is not as it seems on the surface. It also manages to incorporate some very well judged and genuinely laugh-out-loud humour into what otherwise proves to be an ultimately rather dark episode with a real sting in its tail.

Added to this, the Doctor is left with the riddle of the true identity of the Dream Lord (brilliantly played by Toby Jones), which proves to be a particularly compelling component of the episode and one that promises to provide some more twists in the future.

‘Amy’s Choice’ was written by Simon Nye, creator of the 1990s sitcom ‘Men Behaving Badly’ and more recently the co-writer of the misfiring ‘Reggie Perrin’ update.

Review posted 25 April 2010


...

Doctor Who: The Vampires of Venice

...

WARNING: spoilers if you have not watched this episode



Rating 3


Written by Toby Whithouse

Directed by Jonny Campbell

Starring Matt Smith (The Doctor), Karen Gillan (Amy Pond), Arthur Darvill (Rory Williams), Helen McCrory (Rosanna Calvierri), Alex Price (Francesco Calvierri), Lucian Msarnati (Guido), Alisha Bailey (Isabella) and Simon Gregor (Steward)



Following “the kiss”*, the Doctor reunites Amy with her fiancé Rory and takes them in the TARDIS to Venice in 1580 for a romantic weekend to get their relationship back on track. Once there, the Doctor immediately realises that something is wrong and when he investigates a mysterious school for girls run by the city’s patron Rosanna Calvierri it seems that he has uncovered a nest of vampires.

(*See the episode ‘Flesh and Stone’.)

...


Toby Whithouse, who wrote ‘The Vampires of Venice’, is the creator and main writer of the BBC3 series ‘Being Human’, an inspired mix of comedy, drama, thriller and horror that tells the story of a vampire, a werewolf and a ghost who share a house. He previously wrote the season two Doctor Who episode ‘School Reunion’, which saw the return of Elisabeth Sladen as Sarah Jane Smith, and was responsible for my favourite ‘Torchwood’ episode ‘Greeks Bearing Gifts’.

Before I realised that ‘The Vampires of Venice’ was written by Toby Whithouse I had been slightly wary of it. Vampires have started to become rather tired and clichéd recently due to over-exposure, what with the ‘Twilight’ film franchise and the television series ‘True Blood’, amongst others. In the event, it proved to be a very enjoyable episode, with plenty of humour typical of Whithouse, although not without its faults.

Bringing back Rory, who we first encountered in ‘The Eleventh Hour’ (the first episode of this latest season), worked very well. In a clever twist, he was not overwhelmed that the TARDIS is bigger on the inside than outside, immediately guessing that the inside exists within a different dimension. His anger at the Doctor when he tells him “you have no idea how dangerous you make people to themselves” was powerful and palpable, although we might wonder how he has been able to form such an incisive impression of the Doctor so quickly. Perhaps there is more to Rory than meets the eye and we are in for some surprises later on. The prospect is intriguing.

The vampire storyline works well for the first twenty minutes or so, with its echoes of the 1989 story ‘The Curse of Fenric’, but it seems as if one minute they are not affected by light and the next minute they are, something that occurs time and time again. Having watched the episode twice and taken care the second time to look for clues to explain this, it still seems like an inconsistency in the story, unless I am missing a subtle explanation for it. Once we discover that the vampires are, in fact, no such thing the episode does begin to unravel a little bit, but this is always going to be a problem when trying to tell a story in 45 minutes. Everything starts to become rather rushed and frenetic as the action builds up towards its climax.

Signora Calvierri (played by Helen McCrory, who I recently saw in the now cancelled American crime-drama series ‘Life’) clearly knows exactly who the Doctor is once she has discovered that he comes from Gallifrey, although this is not particularly well explained to us. She knows of the fate of the Time Lords and of the part the Doctor played in the Time War, suggesting to him that he is now responsible for the extinction of two races, hers as well as his own. This new season is clearly harking back to the first season of the revived series, both in theme and content.

It does seem a little odd that knowing the creatures are still in the water beneath Venice, the Doctor just leaves them there to die, but I suppose there is nothing he can do to save them. Once again, though, it does seem like an inconsistency in the story. After all, they will presumably continue to devour anyone unfortunate enough to fall into the water. Equally, it seems inconceivable that earlier in the story Signori Calvierri would just allow the Doctor to walk away once she has discovered who he is and that he intends to stop her plans. Surely she would have had him killed immediately or at least hold him captive.

I don’t think this is ultimately destined to be remembered as a classic Doctor Who episode, but it is a very good one and there seems to be a lot here that will become much more relevant as we see future episodes in this season.

‘The Vampires of Venice’ was filmed in Trogir, Croatia, on the Adriatic coast, and at St Donat’s Castle in Glamorgan. It looks fantastic, a very realistic depiction of Venice.

Review posted 9 May 2010


...

Doctor Who: Planet of Fire

...

Rating 2½


Written by Peter Grimwade

Directed by Fiona Cumming

Starring Peter Davison (The Doctor), Nicola Bryant (Peri Brown), Mark Strickson (Turlough), Anthony Ainley (The Master), Peter Wyngarde (Timanov), Barbara Shelley (Sorasta), James Bate (Amyand), Michael Bangerter (Curt), John Alkin (Lomand), Edward Highmore (Malkon), Jonathan Caplan (Roskal), Dallas Adams (Professor Howard Foster) and Gerald Flood (Voice of Kamelion)



The Doctor and Turlough are drawn to the planet Sarn, which holds secrets about Turlough’s identity and past that he is reluctant to share. Once on Sarn they encounter the Doctor’s old adversary the Master. They also pick-up an accidental hitch-hiker along the way, American botany student Perpugilliam ‘Peri’ Brown.

...


Peter Davison had the unenviable task of taking over from Tom Baker, who had played the Doctor for seven seasons between December 1974 and March 1981, by far the longest tenure of any of the actors who have played the role to date. More so than that, Doctor Who was enormously popular during Baker’s tenure, averaging eight or nine million viewers an episode. The final episode of the story ‘The City of Death’, co-written by Douglas Adams and broadcast on 20 October 1979, was watched by over 16 million viewers. It remains a record for the show, one that is extremely unlikely to be broken.

Davison proved to be a clever choice because not only was he quite different to Tom Baker, his Doctor was quite different to any of his predecessors. This Doctor was less arrogant than had been seen in the past, a much more reserved and diffident character. Rather than wanting to always be at the very centre of the action, he was frequently content to remain on the sidelines, observing events as they unfolded from a distance. His relationship with his companions was also quite different in many ways and much more collaborative.

‘Planet of Fire’, the penultimate story to feature Peter Davison, is not the best of his time in the role. In many respects it is hampered by the fact that it needs to help to bring one era to an end and set the scene for the new era that was soon to come, preparing the way for the change from the fifth to the sixth Doctor. Turlough leaves the story here and Peri is introduced, complete with numerous gratuitous bikini scenes. There was also what appeared at the time to be a somewhat unsatisfactory final appearance of the Master, at least as played by Anthony Ainley, although in fact it would not be long before his return.

The story is not an altogether uninteresting one, with its themes of religious belief and intolerance, even if perhaps it is a little flat. There is even some genuine location filming in Lanzarote. It is enlivened by the presence of Peter Wyngarde, who is great value. Wyngarde had been a big star on British television and a larger-than-life one in the late 1960s and early 1970s in ‘Department S’ and its spin-off ‘Jason King’. Barbara Shelley, a familiar face from many British horror films of the 1950s and 1960s, is also featured, although she is underused in a rather inconsequential role.

At the time of Nicola Bryant’s arrival as Peri the producers of the show played down the fact that she is actually British, although she was playing an American character. They were also reluctant to make it known that she was married – oddly enough, to an American, which gave her dual British-American citizenship.

Review posted 8 May 2010


...

Doctor Who: The Twin Dilemma

...

Rating 2½


Written by Anthony Steven (completed by Eric Saward)

Directed by Peter Moffatt

Starring Colin Baker (The Doctor), Nicola Bryant (Peri Brown), Maurice Denham (Professor Edgeworth / Azmael), Edwin Richfield (Mester), Kevin McNally (Hugo Lang), Barry Stanton (Noma), Oliver Smith (Drak), Dennis Chinnery (Sylvest), Gavin Conrad (Romulus), Andrew Conrad (Remus), Seymour Green (Chamberlain), Dione Inman (Elena) and Helen Blatch (Fabian)



Following his regeneration, the Doctor’s behaviour becomes increasingly erratic and borders on psychotic. He attempts to strangle his companion Peri, but apparently remembers nothing of the incident immediately afterwards. He sets the controls of the TARDIS to take them to Titan 3 where, he says, he intends to spend a thousand years of solitude, but once there they encounter Commander Hugo Lang and become tangled up in a mystery involving Azmael, another Time Lord and an old friend of the Doctor.

...


There were two things more than anything else that contributed to the success of Doctor Who when it first began back in 1963. One was the iconic electronic theme music and the other was the creation of the Daleks. However, one thing more than anything else ensured its longevity and that was the regeneration of the Doctor. Initially, it was an expedient forced upon the producers of the show when William Hartnell, the first Doctor, departed in 1966, partly as a result of increasing ill health. The series had been a huge success and they were looking for a novel way of persuading the audience to accept another actor in the lead role. It worked beautifully and it meant that the show could now effectively continue for as long as there was an audience to watch it.

Colin Baker was the sixth Doctor, taking over the role from Peter Davison at the end of the twenty-first season. The regeneration itself took place at the end of the story ‘The Caves of Androzani’, which was voted by fans as the greatest Doctor Who story of all-time in the official magazine in 2009. ‘The Twin Dilemma’ was the final story in that season, told across four episodes between the 22 and 30 March 1984.

Unlike the previous story, ‘The Twin Dilemma’ is not universally well-regarded and it marked the start of a very troubled time for the show. In fact, many fans would claim it is the worst story in the history of the series. Through no fault of Colin Baker, several factors meant that his time in the lead role was not a happy one. In retrospect, however, it is clear that Baker was a good choice for the role and there were some interesting ideas played with during his brief tenure as the Doctor.

Baker’s performance in ‘The Twin Dilemma’ is perhaps rather hammy at times, but this was his first story in the role and the writers were attempting to show a new and much less likeable side of the Doctor. The moment when he attempts to strangle Peri still has enough of an impact to shock. The story itself fizzles, never quite catching fire, and doesn’t make a great deal of sense, but it is enjoyable enough and I rather like Mester, the telepathic giant slug creature.

There was, as I recall it, some unhappiness at the suggestion that this was a Doctor who was deeply flawed, one who bordered on megalomania. It brings to mind the reaction of some fans to Buffy’s flawed and complex character in ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’ – and later on when dislike of both the lead character and the actress who played her had become deeply entrenched in those same fans (irrationally so, in my opinion), their negative reaction to the flaws explored in supporting characters like Willow.

I don’t know if I watched all four episodes of ‘The Twin Dilemma’ the first time around, but I did watch the opening episode and it has always been one that has remained in my memory. I came to it again all these years later not expecting too much, but I was pleasantly surprised. Doctor Who has been much better than this many times, both before and since, but even below its best it remains compulsive viewing.

Review posted 8 May 2010



...

Doctor Who: Battlefield

...

Rating 2¾


Written by Ben Aaronovitch

Directed by Michael Kerrigan

Starring Sylvester McCoy (The Doctor), Sophie Aldred (Ace), Nicholas Courtney (Brigadier Alistair Lethbridge-Stewart), Jean Marsh (Morgaine), James Ellis (Peter Warmsly), Angela Bruce (Brigadier Winifred Bambera), Marcus Gilbert (Ancelyn), Christopher Bowen (Mordred), Ling Tai (Shou Yuing), Noel Collins (Pat Rawlinson), June Bland (Elizabeth Rawlinson), Dorota Rae (Flight Lieutenant Lavel), Robert Jezek (Sergeant Zbrigniev), Paul Tormany (Major Husak), Marek Anton (The Destroyer) and Angela Douglas (Doris Lethbridge-Stewart)



The Doctor responds to a distress signal and the TARDIS materialises close by Lake Vortigern in England in the 20th Century, where he encounters a UNIT convoy transporting a nuclear device. When Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart, now retired from active service, is informed that the Doctor has returned, he immediately responds to the call and a military helicopter is sent to take him to the site. They all get caught up in an ancient war spilling sideways across time from an alternative dimension involving sorcery and the legend of King Arthur. The Doctor is already known to the combatants, who identify him as Merlin.

...


‘Battlefield’, which was broadcast on BBC1 between the 6th and 27th September 1989, was the opening story of the twenty-sixth and final season of the original Doctor Who, the so-called “classic series”. It was the third and final season to feature Sylvester McCoy, the seventh Doctor, although he did return for the “regeneration” scenes in the 1996 film version starring Paul McGann. McCoy is, along with David Tennant, one of two Scottish actors to have played the Doctor.

‘Battlefield’ was made during the period when John Nathan-Turner was producing Doctor Who (pictured with Sylvester McCoy). He was the longest-serving producer on the series, having taken over the role in 1980, and presided over 130 episodes. Nathan-Turner cast the fifth, sixth and seventh Doctors (Pater Davison, Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy), during what became an increasingly turbulent time after the tremendous popularity and success of the Tom Baker years. He dealt with complaints from campaigners like Mary Whitehouse, who thought the show had a negative influence on children, and opposition from within the BBC. He also faced criticism from some fans of the show as a result of the changes he made, not least because of declining audience ratings.

In Sylvester McCoy’s first season the Doctor was portrayed as slightly comical and clownish, not entirely dissimilar to the second Doctor, played by Patrick Troughton. This perhaps was influenced by McCoy’s own acting background and in particular his time as a member of the Ken Campbell Roadshow, where his brand of physical humour included hammering nails up his nose and setting fire to his head. Later on, however, McCoy’s Doctor became a distinctly darker and more ambiguous character.

I have always been extremely fond of McCoy’s third and final season in the role and consider the four stories, told across fourteen episodes, to be amongst my favourites from any era of the series. However, it had been many years since I last watched ‘Battlefield’. It’s an ambitious attempt to marry the legend of King Arthur and Excalibur to a theme of inter-dimension warfare and although it is a little bit messy and convoluted it is not altogether unsuccessful, despite more than a few faults.

The battle scenes do look like the rather peculiar re-enactments that historical societies like to put on and the special effects are a long way short of being realistic. The incidental music is horrible and not remotely fitting, although certainly typical of the late 1980s. These faults, however, are more than made up for by the simple fact that this is a spirited romp, even if it does feel a little rushed at times and perhaps would have benefited from more than its four 25-minute episodes. I would have liked to have seen the Arthurian legend expanded a little more. There is an interesting take on the legend that one day King Arthur will make a messianic return to lead the Britons to freedom and victory. Here, it is ultimately discovered that Arthur turned to dust centuries ago and the continued conflict has been a futile exercise in unnecessary killing and retribution.

There is a return for Nicholas Courtney as Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart after quite a considerable gap. Courtney made his first appearance in the Doctor Who story ‘The Web of Fear’ in early 1968 and was most recently seen in 2008 in the second season of the spin-off series ‘The Sarah Jane Adventures’. There is also an unnecessary but not at all unwelcome appearance by “Bessie”, the car that had been driven by the third Doctor.

When Sylvester McCoy first took over the role of the Doctor he inherited the companion of his predecessor Colin Baker. Sophie Aldred joined in the final story of that first season and her character Ace became the Doctor’s companion for the next two seasons. This was a rebellious, forthright and tough character with a troubled home background and in many ways quite a departure from the past, a clear reaction to the slightly simpering companion exemplified by Jo Grant (played by Katy Manning). Ace is an interesting character and even if Aldred is perhaps not the most skilful of actors, I always thought she was a good match for the role and she and McCoy worked very well together.

A few seeds of the revived series devised by Russell T Davies can be found here. Ace quickly forms a friendship with the only other young person she encounters, Shou Yuing. The Doctor’s relationship with Lethbridge-Stewart is seen at the end of the story to be very much that of old friends. Instead of making a swift departure in the TARDIS, as he would normally do, he stays as a guest at the brigadier’s house. In fact, more than one friendship has been forged during the events just told. Davies expanded on this theme, something that contributed greatly to the success of the revived series.

There are several things in ‘Battlefield’ that alert us to the fact that this story was made in the 1980s and not the 1970s – and that some hard-fought battles had been won in between times. The presence of a female “brigadier” is just one example. In retrospect it may seem rather quaint and for younger viewers the significance of it may be lost entirely now, but it does lend this period of Doctor Who an added importance.

If truth be told, ‘Battlefield’ doesn’t stand the test of time. However, for someone like me who remembers it with great fondness its weaknesses are outweighed by the sheer nostalgic joy of watching it again. It was great fun and brought back some good memories.

The Northern Irish actor James Ellis, who plays archaeologist Peter Warmsly, is a well-known face on British television. He starred in the long-running crime drama series ‘Z Cars’ between 1962 and 1978, appearing in 625 episodes.

Review posted 3 May 2010



...

Doctor Who: ‘The Time of Angels’ and ‘Flesh & Stone’

...

WARNING: spoilers if you have not watched these episodes.


Rating 3½


Written by Steven Moffat

Directed by Adam Smith

Starring Matt Smith (The Doctor), Karen Gillan (Amy Pond), Alex Kingston (River Song), Ian Glen (Octavian), David Atkins (Bob), Darren Morfitt (Marco), Mark Monero (Pedro), George Russo (Phillip), Mark Springer (Christian), Troy Glasgow (Angelo), Simon Dutton (Alistair) and Mike Skinner (Security Guard)



The Doctor spots a 12,000 year old “home box” (a starship version of a black box) in a museum, with a message burnt into it written in ancient Gallifreyan text. Recognising that he is the intended recipient of the message, he takes the TARDIS back in time to rescue River Song from the starship Byzantium, which then crashes into an ancient and long deserted monastery on the planet Alfava Metraxis. A group of soldier clerics led by Father Octavian arrive and the Doctor is informed that a Weeping Angel was in the bowels of the ship and they must now go down into a catacomb of tunnels known as the Maze of the Dead in search of it.

...


The fifth season of the revived Doctor Who (the thirty-first season in total, not including “specials”) started promisingly with ‘The Eleventh Hour’. The second episode ‘The Beast Below’ felt slightest flat first time around, but has benefited from repeat viewings. The rather rushed ‘Victory of the Daleks’ was a slight disappointment, but now the season has hit a high with a two-part story that sees the return of River Song and the Weeping Angels.

River Song, a role originally written with Kate Winslet in mind, but ultimately played by the actress Alex Kingston, first appeared in ‘Silence in the Library’ and ‘Forest of the Dead’, a two-part story in the fourth season of the revived series in 2008. It was hinted at the time that she might have been the Doctor’s wife and in the first of those episodes she asked the Doctor if he yet knew about the crash of the Byzantium, creating a link to this new story. This time around we have stronger hints that River Song is the Doctor’s wife in the future, although it is never explicitly confirmed and denied.

The Weeping Angels made their first appearance in ‘Blink’. That highly-acclaimed episode from 2007 starred Carey Mulligan, who has since received a best actress Academy Award nomination and is tipped for big things in the future, including, so it is claimed, the lead role in a remake of ‘My Fair Lady’. ‘Blink’, ‘Silence in the Library’ and ‘Forest of the Dead’ were all written by Steven Moffat, who has subsequently assumed the role of executive producer and head writer from Russell T Davies. He wrote these two new episodes.

I liked ‘Blink’ very much and thought the Weeping Angels were a fascinating creation. However, because that was such an unusual episode I was not sure about their use again. As it turns out, they work brilliantly here. I didn’t have any strong opinion about River Song following her first appearance, although watching those two episodes again very recently has led me to the conclusion that they are much better than I had remembered, not that I disliked them first time around. I think she works extremely well in these new episodes, but my own preference would be that we don’t meet her again too frequently in the future. The occasional encounter would work best and help to maintain the air of mystery and ambiguity.

I think I am right in saying the budget for this new season of Doctor Who has been cut. It certainly doesn’t show here. These episodes look spectacular and there are some superb special effects. As is the style of Doctor Who now, it is very fast paced, but telling the story across two episodes has allowed for it to build up without the rushed and rather under-cooked feel of ‘Victory of the Daleks’. There is a well-judged aura of foreboding and claustrophobia throughout the two episodes, but particularly in part one. This reaches a crescendo when the young soldier-cleric Bob radios Octavian and the Doctor and it is discovered that he is, in fact, already dead.

There are one or two moments that don’t really work that well and are perhaps best not given too much thought – for example, Amy walking with her eyes shut amongst the Weeping Angels, tricking them into believing that she can see them. I guess this works if we assume the Doctor did not have any better solution to the problem and this was the only thing he could think of in a seemingly hopeless situation. His demeanour and loss of temper with River Song certainly suggests that he was feeling the pressure and I for one am pleased to see this side of him, previously evident in Christopher Eccleston’s Doctor, starting to come to the surface again.

I still do have a sense of déjà vu, something that has been with me since ‘The Beast Below’. Apart from the return of River Song and the Weeping Angels, there are many other things here to remind us of previous stories in the revived series. Episodes that immediately came to my mind include ‘The Satan Pit’ and ‘The Waters of Mars’.

The closing scene in which Amy passionately kisses the Doctor and tries to entice him into bed has caused some debate and disquiet. I had not read about this before watching ‘Flesh & Stone’ and it did come as a surprise on first viewing. I have subsequently learned that the Daily Mail has rather predictably taken against it. That newspaper has already previously complained about Karen Gillan being too sexy, laughably and implausibly claiming that at no time previously could any of the Doctor’s companions be described as “sexy”. Having watched ‘Flesh & Stone’ again, I think the scene works very well. I am not going to worry unduly about where it might lead to just yet.

Reaction to the new Doctor and to this new season has been generally very positive, but there have been some dissenting voices. One particularly angry fan comment I have read in response to ‘The Time of Angels’ and ‘Flesh & Stone’ suggests that it is now so bad on every level that it should be cancelled immediately. The only reason I am not more taken aback by such opinions, apparently coming from fans of the show, is that I encountered exactly the same thing in the days of ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’. At that time I was quite shocked that a large minority of fans seemed so angry and critical and so quick to voice their disapproval, but now I realise it is just a symptom of such loyal and fanatical fandoms.

The cameo appearance by Mike Skinner in the opening scene of ‘The Time of Angels’ passed me by completely because, up to that moment, I did not actually know what he looked like.

My expectations of this new season are probably still too high just now, but this was very good. I don’t think there is a better show on television at the moment.

Review posted 2 May 2010


...

Doctor Who: The War Games

...

Rating 3½


Written by Terrance Dicks and Malcolm Hulke

Directed by David Maloney

Starring Patrick Troughton (The Doctor); Frazer Hines (Jamie); Wendy Padbury (Zoe); David Savile (Lieutenant Carstairs); Philip Madoc (War Lord); Edward Brayshaw (War Chief); James Brae (Security Chief); Vernon Dobtcheff (Scientist); Jane Sherwin (Lady Jennifer Buckingham); Noel Coleman (General Smythe); Hubert Rees (Captain Ransom); Richard Steele (Commandant Gorton); Graham Weston (Russell); David Troughton (Moor); Rudolph Walker (Harper); Bermard Horsfell (First Time Lord); Trevor Martin (Second Time Lord) and Clyde Pollitt (Third Time Lord)



The TARDIS materialises in no-man’s land in what appears to be a trench war zone in the Great War. The Doctor and his two companions, Jamie and Zoe, end up in the field headquarters of the British Army, where they are accused of being spies and court-martialled and the Doctor is sentenced to be executed by firing squad. However, when they escape and find themselves chased by Roman foot soldiers it quickly becomes apparent that all is not as it seems. They are at the epicentre of a complex Alien plot to become absolute rulers of the Galaxy.

...


‘The War Games’ was the final regular story to feature the second Doctor, played by Patrick Troughton, although he did turn up again on three more occasions in the company of subsequent Doctors. It was told across ten episodes and a total running time a little over four hours between 19 April and 21 June 1969. As far as I know, only ‘The Daleks Master Plan’, told across twelve episodes in late 1965 and early 1966, is longer, unless one counts ‘The Trial of a Time Lord’ in 1986. 63 episodes from the Patrick Troughton era are lost, so we should be grateful that all ten episodes of ‘The War Games’ still exist and in good condition. This was the last time Doctor Who was filmed in black and white.

Despite its lengthy running time, ‘The War Games’ has surprising few real dead spots, although it does have a tendency to repeat itself a little too often and undoubtedly would have benefited from some trimming. The concept is a very interesting one and the subtext about the horror and futility of war is admirable. The recreation of the horrific reality of trench warfare is surprisingly effective, if perhaps the other war zones are not quite so successfully realised. Some extremely dodgy attempts at German, American and Mexican accents do not help, but somehow the variable acting doesn’t really seem to matter. Some of the acting is truly awful, but that is part of the period charm of it all.

Special mention must be given to Philip Madoc for a great performance as the War Lord. Madoc had already made an appearance in the 1966 film ‘Daleks Invasion Earth 2150AD’, which is not considered to be part of canon, and in another Patrick Troughton story ‘The Krotons’ in 1968. He appeared in Doctor Who again in 1976 in one of my favourite stories, ‘The Brain of Morbius’, which was written by Terrance Dicks, one of the two co-writers of ‘The War Games’. I loved the hammy performance of James Brae as the Security Chief. The strange over-emphasised monotone voice patterns he employed are almost identical to Dan Aykroyd in the Saturday Night Live sketches and 1993 film ‘Coneheads’. It made me smile, but at the same time it was strangely chilling.

There is an appearance by Rudolph Walker, who went on to star in the contentious 1970s sit-com ‘Love Thy Neighbour’ and later on in ‘The Thin Blue Line’ with Rowan Atkinson, before joining the cast of the soap opera ‘EastEnders’. There is also an early role for David Troughton, the son of Patrick Troughton and an acclaimed stage and television actor in his own right. He has appeared in Doctor Who again, most recently in the 2008 episode ‘Midnight’ with David Tennant.

The few Patrick Troughton stories that I can still recall are very stylised. That is particularly true here when the action moves from the war zones to the Alien centre of operations, complete with control panels that are actually nothing more than metal shapes on a magnetic board. This is, I think, the first time we visit the home planet of the Time Lords, although the name Gallifrey is not actually mentioned. I also think it is the first time they are called the “Time Lords”.

Troughton’s Doctor is often referred to as the “Cosmic Hobo”. He was quite different to the first Doctor, portrayed by William Hartnell, and indeed to his successor Jon Pertwee. He often appeared befuddled, but was something of a trickster, meaning that his adversaries would underestimate his quicksilver mind. He had a number of catch-phrases, of which the one I recall best is, “When I say run... RUN!”

As well as being Patrick Troughton’s final story, ‘The War Games’ also marks the departure of Fraser Hines, who played Jamie Robert McCrimmon from ‘The Highlander’ in December 1966, the second story with Troughton, onwards. Hines returned, alongside Patrick Troughton, to appear in the ‘The Five Doctors’ in 1983 and ‘The Two Doctors’ in 1985. Wendy Padbury also departed at the end of ‘The War Games’. Her character Zoe Heriot had first appeared in ‘The Wheel in Space’ in April 1968. She made one subsequent appearance, a cameo in ‘The Five Doctors’. Padbury went on to star in a now largely-forgotten series called ‘Freewheelers’, while Hines was among the regular cast of the long-running soap opera ‘Emmerdale Farm’ (later shortened to ‘Emmerdale’) between 1972 and 1994.

I don’t know where ‘The War Games’ sits in the pantheon of classic Doctor Who stories, but while it certainly isn’t without its faults, I enjoyed it immensely.

Review posted 2 May 2010



...

Doctor Who: An Unearthly Child (classic series)

...

Rating 2½ (5 for the pilot episode)


Written by Anthony Coburn (and C E Webber, uncredited)

Directed by Waris Hussein (and Douglas Camfield – film inserts, uncredited)

Starring William Hartnell (The Doctor), Carole Ann Ford (Susan Foreman), Jacqueline Hill (Barbara Wright), William Russell (Ian Chesterton), Derek Newark (Za), Jeremy Young (Kal), Alethea Charlton (Hur), Howard Lang (Horg) and Eileen Way (Old Mother)



Schoolteacher Barbara Wright is concerned about her pupil Susan Foreman and shares these concerns with her colleague Ian Chesterton. Susan is unusually bright in many respects, but strangely uninformed in others. She is also secretive about her home life, other than to say she lives with her grandfather, who doesn’t like strangers. Barbara and Ian decide to confront Susan’s grandfather and go to the scrap yard Susan has given as her address. When they go inside the gates they discover a blue Police box and are then confronted by the elderly man, who is both evasive and angry at their interference. When they hear Susan’s voice from inside the box they force their way past the old man, only to discover that it is considerably bigger on the inside than out. Susan tells her teachers they are in a machine that can travel in time and space, which they do not believe. The Doctor angrily tells them they can now not leave and uses the controls to take them away from London in 1963 back in time to the Stone Age, where they all find themselves in deadly danger.

...


The very first episode of ‘Doctor Who’, entitled ‘An Unearthly Child’, was broadcast on BBC (there was only one BBC channel at the time) on 23 November 1963. It was part of a story told across four episodes. During the early years of the series, up to the latter stages of the third season in the Spring of 1966, each episode was given a separate title. So it was that ‘An Unearthly Child’ was followed by the episodes ‘The Cave of Skulls’, ‘The Forest of Fear’ and ‘The Firemaker’. However, it is the opening episode that is of particular interest and especially an earlier version, filmed a month or so before the one that was broadcast. Referred to these days as the “pilot” episode, it was not intended as such, but there were several technical problems identified with it and the depiction of the Doctor was considered to be too sinister and too frightening for younger viewers. It is this pilot that is most interesting to me.

I think it is superior to the later version, although how long the series could have progressed with such a cruel and unsympathetic version of the Doctor is a moot point. Even with the character softened somewhat through re-writes, William Hartnell continued to play him as an irascible and autocratic figure, emphasising his alien nature. This is something, to a lesser extent, that subsequent actors who assumed the role later on have continued to do from time to time, right through to the revived series, starting with Christopher Eccleston’s war-scarred Doctor in 2005.

The pilot is certainly rough around the edges, but even after nearly 47 years it still packs a punch, as does the later broadcast version. A big part of this, of course, is thanks to the opening credit visuals and the extraordinary theme music, composed by Ron Grainer and created by Delia Derbyshire at the BBC Radiophonic Workshop, using electronic oscillators and various pioneering tape loop and reverse tape effects. The other most significant contribution to the early and ongoing success of the series is the TARDIS, the time machine shaped like a Police box. Although an anachronism now that many younger viewers would not be familiar with outside of the series, they were still a common sight throughout the 1960s and, in fact, there are apparently one of two still in use in rural areas.

The BBC already had an established reputation for innovative and popular sci-fi drama, first in the 1950s with the ‘Quatermass’ trilogy (the three serials were broadcast live) and then in 1961 with ‘A for Andromeda’, which starred Julie Christie in one of her earliest roles. Tragically, only one of the seven episodes has survived. Much like these earlier productions, the episode ‘An Unearthly Child’, whether the pilot or the broadcast version, remains a significant moment in the history of British television and film science-fiction.

The following three episodes that make up the first story are not of as much interest and seen through our eyes now are borderline offensive, with their depiction of unintelligent “savages”, and entirely historically unauthentic and unrealistic. However, they do need to be considered within the context of the time in which they were made. What is interesting is that it is the character Ian Chesterton who is most proactive in getting them out of the predicament they find themselves in, while the Doctor often sulks and behaves in an almost childish manner, his pride easily hurt. He is a long way removed from the humanitarian Doctor of later years.

The Foreman scrap yard visited by Barbara and Ian in the opening episode, where they first encounter the Doctor and enter the TARDIS, is seen again in two subsequent stories much later on – ‘Attack of the Cybermen’ in 1985 and ‘Remembrance of the Daleks’ in 1989.

William Hartnell, the first Doctor, was an experienced theatre and film actor whose career dated back to the 1920s. He was 55 years old when he assumed the role, but he looked older. He was, by some accounts, not always easy to work with during his time on Doctor Who and ill health meant he had problems memorising his lines. He played the role in the first three seasons and the first two stories of season four. His final episode was broadcast on 29 October 1966. He returned briefly to appear in ‘The Three Doctors’ in December 1972 through into January 1973, although his appearance was limited by health problems. He died in 1975 at the age of 67.

Derek Newark, who appears in episodes two to four of this initial story, appeared in Doctor Who again in 1970 at the time of the third Doctor in a story called ‘Inferno’. It was primarily directed by Douglas Camfield, who was assistant director to Waris Hussein on ‘An Unearthly Child’ and directed some of the second unit film inserts.

Review posted 26 April 2010


...

Doctor Who: Victory of the Daleks

...

Rating 2


Written by Mark Gatiss

Directed by Andrew Gunn

Starring Matt Smith (The Doctor), Karen Gillan (Amelia ‘Amy’ Pond), Ian McNeice (Winston Churchill), Bill Patterson (Professor Edwin Bracewell), Tim Wallers (Captain Childers), Susannah Fielding (Lillian), Nina de Cosimo (Blanche) and Colin Procktor (ARP Warden)



The Doctor receives a call from Winston Churchill and the TARDIS materialises in the cabinet war rooms beneath London. The British have a new secret weapon in their war against the Nazis; “ironsides” invented and built by Professor Edwin Bracewell. The Doctor instantly recognises these new weapons as Daleks and desperately attempts to warn Churchill of the deadly danger he has unleashed, while trying to unravel Bracewell’s motivation for his apparent deception and discover the secret plan of the Daleks.

...


The third episode of season five of the revived series brings back the Doctor’s most deadly and iconic adversaries, the Daleks. I am not particularly a fan of the Daleks and I do feel, as do others, that they are in danger of becoming overused. They first appeared in a Doctor Who story called ‘The Daleks’ (or ‘The Mutants’) in December 1963. They appeared in sixteen stories in total in the so-called “classic series”, making their final appearance in ‘Remembrance of the Daleks’ in October 1988. This is their sixth appearance since the revival of the series in 2005.

I always look forward to a new Doctor Who episode, but perhaps the Dalek episodes are not amongst my favourites. However, Phelim O’Neill wrote in the Guardian about ‘Victory of the Daleks’, “Many are fearing the return of the overused Daleks for all the wrong reasons. Tonight should see those same doubters eagerly awaiting their next appearance... This is the new Doctor’s first outright classic episode.” I also noticed that the episode was written by Mark Gatiss. This made me go in with much higher expectations, but in the end I came away slightly disappointed. It was another fairly typical Dalek episode. It was quite enjoyable in a frenetic kind of way, but it was flawed. I don’t think it was a classic and ultimately I found it rather unsatisfying.

The premise was an interesting one, but it needed more than 45 minutes to tell the story. It felt rushed to me and I continue to believe that it isn’t necessary for every single story to be told at such a frenetic pace. It is all a bit exhausting.

Once the Doctor has established what the Daleks are planning the story does start to unravel a little bit. There has been criticism of the Dalek ship, but surely the slightly comical no-expense-spent DIY look of it was deliberate. My initial reaction to the preposterous sight of the Spitfires attacking the spaceship in outer space beyond the atmosphere of the planet Earth (in what I take to be a nod towards the climactic scenes in the original ‘Star Wars’ film) was to find it quite insulting in its stupidity. However, it was clearly intended with tongue firmly in cheek and the silliness and humour of it all should be greeted with a smile. There has been criticism about the somewhat anti-climactic ending, but clearly this is just a prelude to another story, presumably to be told at the end of this season.

The crack in time witnessed in the opening episode of season five has now reappeared at the close of the next two episodes, signalling that something similar to the “Bad Wolf” story-arc of season one is coming.

Ian McNeice gives a broad impersonation of Churchill and unlike some fans I didn’t mind the implication that he and the Doctor are old friends, despite there being no suggestion of that in the history of the series before now. I do, however, appreciate that the portrayal of someone as complex and contentious as Churchill as a genial old cove is considerably wide of the mark. It was nice to see Bill Patterson – and Professor Bracewell proved to be a effective character. However, where Russell T Davies was a master of bringing life to even the most peripheral characters and inhabiting them with real emotional resonance, it is perhaps something this new season is going to lack.

‘Victory of the Daleks’ contained some very nice touches and the story was given extra frisson by the knowledge that when Terry Nation first created the Daleks 47 years ago he based them on the Nazis. Having said that, I do not imagine it is destined to become one of my favourites and I don’t think it is the “outright classic” suggested by Phelim O’Neill. I have given the episode a rating of two, which acknowledges the high standards of the series in general and my own high expectations of it.

Early indications are that ‘Victory of the Daleks’ was watched by an audience in the region of 6.2 million viewers, just under 33% of the total television audience during that timeslot. Although this is not an exceptional result, it is still a very strong showing.

Review posted 18 April 2010


...

Life

...

Rating 2½


Created by Rand Ravich

Writers: Rafael Alvarez, Laurie Arent, Wendolyn Calhoun, R J Colleary, Marjorie David, Scott M Gimple, Joe Hortua, David Manson, Glen Mazzara, Rand Ravich, Melissa Scrivner, Jonathan Shapiro, Far Shariat

Directors: Adam Arkin, John Behring, John Dahl, Holly Dale, Tucker Gates, Elodie Keene, Fred Keller, Peter Markle, Paul McCrane, Daniel Sackheim, David Semel, Marcos Siega, David Straiton, Lawrence Thrilling, Jay Torres, Tony Wharmby

Starring Damian Lewis (Detective Charlie Crews), Sarah Shahi (Detective Dani Reese), Adam Arkin (Ted Earley), Brent Sexton (Officer Bobby Stark), Donal Logue (Captain Kevin Tidwell), Robin Weigert (Lt Sgt Karen Davis), Jessy Schram (Rachel Seybolt), Victor Rivers (Jack Reese), Garret Dillahunt (Roman Nevikov), Shashawnee Hall (Special Agent Paul Bodner), Roger Aaron Brown (Carl Ames), Jennifer Siebel (Jennifer Conover), Titus Welliver (Titus Hollis), Brooke Langton (Constance Griffiths), Christina Hendricks (Olivia Canton), Gabrielle Union (Detective Jane Seever) and Helen McCrory (Amanda Puryer)


LAPD uniform police officer Charlie Crews is wrongly convicted of a double murder and spends twelve years in high security prisons. When the conviction is quashed and he is released he receives a $50 million compensation settlement and is reinstated in the LAPD as a homicide detective. He is assigned Detective Dani Reese, who harbours her own problems, as his partner and begins an unofficial investigation to identify the people who framed up, an investigation that leads him to his partner’s father, retired LAPD police caption Jack Reese.

...


‘Life’ was an NBC police drama broadcast across two seasons and a total of 32 episodes between 26 September 2007 and 8 April 2009, at which point NBC announced that it would not return for a third season. It starred the acclaimed and skilled English actor Damian Lewis, who had previously made an impact on American television in the 2001 mini-series ‘Band of Brothers’, and Sarah Shahi, who is perhaps otherwise best known for her role in seasons two and three of the television drama series ‘The L Word’. The English stage actress Helen McCrory, the wife of Damian Lewis, had a recurring role in season two of the show. ‘Life’ was created by Rand Ravich, the writer/director of the 1999 Johnny Depp film ‘The Astronaut’s Wife’

It is standard practice that all American network police procedurals come with a quirk; something that is intended to make each one stand out against the others in what is otherwise a very formulaic genre. ‘Life’ came with an overabundance of quirks and that, perhaps, was partly its downfall. Charlie Crews had so many tics and idiosyncrasies that he made even Dr Gregory House (from the hugely and I think inexplicably popular television medical drama ‘House’) seem positively mundane. To add to an already bursting to the seams collection of quirks displayed by Crews, his partner Dani Reese was a recovering drug addict and alcoholic with a major chip on her shoulder and Kevin Tidwell, the captain of their homicide division (in season two of the show), had an eccentric personality and an unpredictable approach to his job. The basic premise of the show, of course, was already patently ridiculous, but it was compounded by too much silliness and too many characters who were written out without proper explanation.

Crews was a Zen-like character who bought himself a huge house in the hills and seemed to be addicted to very fast and very expensive cars, but who had no furniture in his house because he claimed his life was not ruled by possessions or material things. He obsessively ate fruit of all kinds and varieties and constantly expressed childlike wonder at technological advances that had occurred while he was in prison. He was a very high profile and contentious figure in the LAPD, one that was potentially very embarrassing for them, so they assigned him a partner who was a recovering drug-addict and alcoholic with some serious issues of her own. The silliness was piled on thick and fast.

Throughout the first season and the first half of season two Crews was obsessed with his former wife, constantly harassing her new husband and ultimately breaking down her defences and persuading her to sleep with him. It was a pointless and grating sub-plot and neither character was seen or mentioned again afterwards. The defence attorney who continued to work for twelve years to have the conviction quashed and Crews released from prison and who seemed to be an important figure in his life was suddenly written out of the show without warning. Crews was obsessed with finding his god-daughter, the daughter of the friends he was wrongly convicted of murdering. When he finally did track her down, he brought her to stay with him. Subsequently, he decided it was not safe for her and sent her away. She was not seen or mentioned again. In the first season the homicide division Crews was assigned to was headed up by a character who proved to be a decidedly uninteresting presence and was summarily written out at the start of season two and replaced with a new character. The rather sudden disappearance of Jack Reese in season two was treated with far too little concern by characters who should have taken much more interest in his absence, until a rather clunky explanation for his disappearance was provided in the final episodes.

I found the sudden departure of Dani Reese from the main storyline during the closing episodes of season two rather strange. The reasons given for this and her brief appearances in subsequent episodes didn’t work very well for me to explain what was going on. It was only after I had finished watching the season and read about the background of the show that I discovered that the actress Sarah Shahi was pregnant. Initially, the character Bobby Stark was temporarily promoted upwards to become Crews’ new partner and I thought that worked quite well, but after a couple of episodes he was suddenly replaced, for no obvious reason.

The necessity to make allowances for Sarah Shahi’s pregnancy is understandable, but there seems to have been far too many other instances of the writers simply changing their minds about a character or storyline. This is not altogether uncommon in the early stages of American network shows, but surely not usually to this degree?

The premise, as I have already mentioned, was preposterous and the season-wide conspiracy story-arc in season two became increasingly convoluted, to the point where, except for the absence of aliens, it was almost heading into ‘The X-Files’ territory. I was, I should mention, reasonably diverted by this storyline, although it was ultimately rushed to a somewhat unconvincing conclusion (perhaps because the writers knew that show was not coming back and wanted to tie up some loose ends).

There were as many problems in the show as good points, perhaps more, and I really struggled to get past the first episode, which I found monumentality irritating. However, for all the faults and for all of my criticisms, I did end up enjoying it, although whether or not I’d want to watch the whole thing again is another matter entirely.

The opening episode of ‘Life’ attracted an audience of 10.15 million viewers on NBC. The low point was the eighteenth episode of the second season, which was watched by 4.22 million viewers. The final episode attracted 4.5 million viewers. The first season of the show was disrupted by the Writers Guild of America strike and only eleven episodes were made, although twenty-two had been commissioned. Several writers did not return for the second season, which ran to twenty-one episodes.

Review posted 17 April 2010


...

Doctor Who: The Beast Below

...

Rating 2¾


Written by Steven Moffat

Directed by Andrew Gunn

Starring Matt Smith (The Doctor), Karen Gillan (Amelia ‘Amy’ Pond), Sophie Okonedo (Liz Ten), Hannah Sharp (Mandy), Alfie Field (Timmy), Terrence Hardiman (Hawthorne), Christopher Good (Mo
rgan) and David Ajala (Peter)


This is Amy’s first journey in the TARDIS. The Doctor takes her far into the future to a spacecraft that look like a skyline of skyscrapers suspended in space, each one bearing the name of a different English county. He says this is what remains of the United Kingdom of Britain and Northern Ireland after the planet Earth was destroyed by solar flares, although it does not include Scotland because the Scottish people wanted their own ship. They discover a young girl who is crying and yet being ignored by all those around her and the Doctor tells Amy to find out why the girl is upset. He also wants her to find out more about the strange painted “fairground” heads that sit motionless in glass-fronted booths. Meanwhile, he goes off to investigate why there is not even the faintest hint of vibration on the giant spacecraft and discovers it has no engine. During these investigations he encounters Liz Ten, the incumbent British monarch, who already knows who he is.

...


‘The Beast Below’ is the second episode of the fifth season of the revived series and the second episode to feature the new doctor and companion. As was the case with the opening episode, ‘The Eleventh Hour’, it was written by Steven Moffat, who has assumed the role of head writer and executive producer following the departure of Russell T Davies.

This is an episode that contains many of the classic elements of Doctor Who and mirrors several themes already seen in the revived series, including the underlying alien nature of the Doctor and the consequences of the burden he is constantly required to shoulder. It contains some memorable moments, but on first viewing I came away from it with a sense of déjà vu. Somehow it just felt like we’d seen all this before and the episode as a whole was slightly underwhelming. Some fans have already noted the similarity to the episode ‘The Long Game’ in the first season of the revived series. There are also clear links back to ‘The Idiot Lantern’ in season two and, in terms at least of the subtext drawing a parallel with the political landscape of Britain, perhaps even a comparison to ‘The Happiness Patrol’ from the Sylvester McCoy era of the late 1980s.

There is an amusing little joke about Scotland – the character Amelia Pond is Scottish, as is Karen Gillan, the actress who plays her, and indeed Steven Moffat. There is also a cleverly timed statement about elections and voting and the fact that the right to protest in this country has been greatly eroded in the lifetime of the current government. The Doctor tellingly comments, “Once every five years everyone chooses to forget what they’ve learned – democracy in action”, and at one point directly refers to the Britain of the far future as displaying all the signs of a police state.

Centre stage is largely given over to Amy to further establish this character. The early signs are very positive and I am inclined to say that Karen Gillan may prove to be the best companion since Bille Piper. Matt Smith has also quickly settled into the role of the Doctor and entertainingly so, although it is too early to judge how he will ultimately compare to his ten predecessors. The character Liz Ten did not work at all for me and the other characters unique to the episode are too sketchy to make much impact, none of them occupying much more than a few minutes of screen time, although the 12-year-old Mandy is actually a quite effective character, being very aware of what is happening around her, unlike the adults who bury their heads in the sand and ignore her, partly because she is a child and partly because she is not yet old enough to vote.

At the moment I suspect my expectations of the fifth season is creating a sense of anti-climax. With a new Doctor, a new companion, a new head writer and new producers I was hoping for a change of direction, a new approach to the series. However, what we seem to have is a rehash of what we’ve already seen during the previous five years. Time will tell, of course, and there are still eleven episodes remaining in this new season. ‘The Beast Below’ may well be an episode that improves with repeated viewings, but my initial reaction is one of slight disappointment.

Additional: Having watched the episode for a second time my opinion about the character Liz Ten remains unchanged, but overall I thought it was much better than my initial reaction to it suggested and it certainly deserves a nod for the use of the word “minging”.

Review posted 11 April 2010


...